Oh man, we have two very different ideas of systems. I felt slink was
far too old to bother with when I was running potato, and if someone
asked me to go back to potato today, I would be driven up the wall. :)
I don't know why your report was closed. My guess is, whoever closed it
simply raced thr
Oh man, we have two very different ideas of systems. I felt slink was
far too old to bother with when I was running potato, and if someone
asked me to go back to potato today, I would be driven up the wall. :)
I don't know why your report was closed. My guess is, whoever closed it
simply raced th
* Rounds Nathaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001130 16:38]:
> I don't know if you have access to the original bug report, but I tried
Heh, the wonderful thing about debian is that the bug reports are all
available via a filesystem rather than through CGI business. So, all the
debian bug reports get ind
* Rounds Nathaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001130 16:38]:
> I don't know if you have access to the original bug report, but I tried
Heh, the wonderful thing about debian is that the bug reports are all
available via a filesystem rather than through CGI business. So, all the
debian bug reports get in
Nathaniel, you are right -- reporting a bug against -10 and hearing it
is fixed in -7 is a little strange.
WRT your error message, I have approached similar problems in the past
by using dpkg directly on the apt-downloaded .deb packages, using the
--force-overwrite option. The problem isn't the ac
Nathaniel, you are right -- reporting a bug against -10 and hearing it
is fixed in -7 is a little strange.
WRT your error message, I have approached similar problems in the past
by using dpkg directly on the apt-downloaded .deb packages, using the
--force-overwrite option. The problem isn't the a
6 matches
Mail list logo
