Re: 7.1 protos up-to-date in experimental - ready for unstable?

2006-08-02 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 14:37 +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: If we're happy to live without xf86rushproto, then can we now bring the outstanding experimental proto packages across to unstable? Not without dealing with at least one issue, I think: Anyone remember what happened when David

Re: 7.1 protos up-to-date in experimental - ready for unstable?

2006-08-02 Thread David Nusinow
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 02:37:20PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: All existing x11proto packages are up to date for X11R7.1, either in unstable or in experimental. x11proto-core is ahead of schedule, at latest v7.0.7 rather than 7.1's v7.0.5. Debian does not contain a x11proto package for

Re: 7.1 protos up-to-date in experimental - ready for unstable?

2006-08-01 Thread Daniel Stone
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 02:37:20PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: Debian does not contain a x11proto package for xf86rushproto, applewmproto, or windowswmproto, the latter for obvious reasons. I gather we don't need xf86rushproto? If we're happy to live without xf86rushproto, then can we now