Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 215647 + wontfix
Bug#215647: xterm: change the encoding according to the current LC_CTYPE locale
Tags were: wontfix experimental patch
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 215647 xterm: change the encoding according to the current LC_CTYPE locale
Bug#215647: xterm: want ISO 10646-1 fonts used by default instead of ISO 8559-1
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 215647
Bug#215647: xterm: want ISO 10646-1 fonts used by default instead of ISO 8559-1
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 07:21:19AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> The solution to this problem is probably by finding more and more
> manpower for maintaining our packages and all stuff we want to
> progress in Debian.
>
> If we lack manpower, we have to make sacrifices, which is always hard
>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:28:10PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> Nope, my sole intention was to be as assholish as you were in your
> original post.
What a noble goal. In any case, I'd say you exceeded your own
expectations.
> That said, I would be glad to help and subscribe to debian-x just now
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 04:02:34PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
[...]
> Let's not forget, although apparently you have, that I was one of the
> first adopters of po-debconf.
>
> Given how often your own localization patches have been submitted and
> accepted (usually pretty promptly -- the next
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 09:36:31PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:52:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [...]
> > The bug submitter had already contacted the upstream maintainer of
> > XTerm, and the patches had been rejected by him. Apparently, the
> > submitter's goa
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 09:36:31PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:52:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [...]
> > The bug submitter had already contacted the upstream maintainer of
> > XTerm, and the patches had been rejected by him. Apparently, the
> > submitter's goa
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:14:31PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> You should have requested to tag it directly "wontfix", you would have saved
> yourself some work ;) Or was the discussion with upstream done in the
> meantime?
Yes, discussion was done with upstream in the meantime.
> I also fail
9 matches
Mail list logo
