[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Branden Robinson) writes:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 04:11:04AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > I tried the ati server again and without the faulty font entry that
> > actually works.
>
> The font entry is not "faulty". How about actually reading the bug reports
> I tell you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Branden Robinson) writes:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 04:11:04AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > I tried the ati server again and without the faulty font entry that
> > actually works.
>
> The font entry is not "faulty". How about actually reading the bug reports
> I tell yo
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 04:11:04AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> I tried the ati server again and without the faulty font entry that
> actually works.
The font entry is not "faulty". How about actually reading the bug reports
I tell you to consult?
--
G. Branden Robinson|Expe
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 04:11:04AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> I tried the ati server again and without the faulty font entry that
> actually works.
The font entry is not "faulty". How about actually reading the bug reports
I tell you to consult?
--
G. Branden Robinson|Exp
4 matches
Mail list logo