On 12.08.2015 00:35, Robert Ancell wrote:
> You said "it's not worth the trouble" - I don't think it's any
> signficant trouble...
No I just ignored the simple fact that the update bumped soname, so what
you did was absolutely correct.. oops
> There's no transition required that I know of - all e
You said "it's not worth the trouble" - I don't think it's any signficant
trouble...
There's no transition required that I know of - all existing packages will
continue to build fine using the transitional libxcb-util0-dev package and
over time build-dependencies will be updated and this package c
On 11.08.2015 08:03, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>
> so will you handle the migration on Debian too? since pkg-xorg won't
right, so with another look it indeed looks like the sover got bumped in
_this_ version and not before.. ugh, sorry about that!
still needs the transition
--
t
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
3 matches
Mail list logo