Re: SV: READ THIS; Debian XFree86 4.0.1 mini-FAQ

2000-09-28 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 05:47:02PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 10:20:38AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote: > > > > And, if I'm not mistaken, imlib is one of Rasterman's over-glitzy > > under-functional piles of code... :) > > Well, I don't think this is a very productive thread,

Re: SV: READ THIS; Debian XFree86 4.0.1 mini-FAQ

2000-09-28 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 05:47:02PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 10:20:38AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote: > > > > And, if I'm not mistaken, imlib is one of Rasterman's over-glitzy > > under-functional piles of code... :) > > Well, I don't think this is a very productive thread

Re: SV: READ THIS; Debian XFree86 4.0.1 mini-FAQ

2000-09-26 Thread Joshua Shagam
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 05:47:02PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 10:20:38AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote: > > > > And, if I'm not mistaken, imlib is one of Rasterman's over-glitzy > > under-functional piles of code... :) > > Well, I don't think this is a very productive thread,

Re: SV: READ THIS; Debian XFree86 4.0.1 mini-FAQ

2000-09-26 Thread Jules Bean
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 10:20:38AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote: > > And, if I'm not mistaken, imlib is one of Rasterman's over-glitzy > under-functional piles of code... :) Well, I don't think this is a very productive thread, but... No. Imlib may have had some bugs (what doesn't) but raster was q

Re: SV: READ THIS; Debian XFree86 4.0.1 mini-FAQ

2000-09-26 Thread Joshua Shagam
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 09:35:50AM +0100, Jules Bean wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 10:36:02AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote: > > > How recent are we talking about here? I never noticed any problem with > > > phase2v8, but in the past few days I haven't been running much X > > > applications > > >

Re: SV: READ THIS; Debian XFree86 4.0.1 mini-FAQ

2000-09-26 Thread Joshua Shagam
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 05:47:02PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 10:20:38AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote: > > > > And, if I'm not mistaken, imlib is one of Rasterman's over-glitzy > > under-functional piles of code... :) > > Well, I don't think this is a very productive thread

Re: SV: READ THIS; Debian XFree86 4.0.1 mini-FAQ

2000-09-26 Thread Jules Bean
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 10:20:38AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote: > > And, if I'm not mistaken, imlib is one of Rasterman's over-glitzy > under-functional piles of code... :) Well, I don't think this is a very productive thread, but... No. Imlib may have had some bugs (what doesn't) but raster was

Re: SV: READ THIS; Debian XFree86 4.0.1 mini-FAQ

2000-09-26 Thread Joshua Shagam
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 09:35:50AM +0100, Jules Bean wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 10:36:02AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote: > > > How recent are we talking about here? I never noticed any problem with > > > phase2v8, but in the past few days I haven't been running much X applications > > > apart

Re: SV: READ THIS; Debian XFree86 4.0.1 mini-FAQ

2000-09-26 Thread Jules Bean
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 10:36:02AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote: > > How recent are we talking about here? I never noticed any problem with > > phase2v8, but in the past few days I haven't been running much X > > applications > > apart from WindowMaker, xpdf, emacs, xterm and xscreensaver, and it ha

Re: SV: READ THIS; Debian XFree86 4.0.1 mini-FAQ

2000-09-26 Thread Jules Bean
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 10:36:02AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote: > > How recent are we talking about here? I never noticed any problem with > > phase2v8, but in the past few days I haven't been running much X applications > > apart from WindowMaker, xpdf, emacs, xterm and xscreensaver, and it has ne

Re: SV: READ THIS; Debian XFree86 4.0.1 mini-FAQ

2000-09-25 Thread Joshua Shagam
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 04:47:09PM +0200, Torbjörn Andersson wrote: > Branden Robinson wrote: > > > * Yes, the shared memory extension is broken in recent phase2 packages. > > This is a recent development in upstream CVS. If you'd like to help fix > > it, subscribe to xpert@xfree86.org and pu

Re: SV: READ THIS; Debian XFree86 4.0.1 mini-FAQ

2000-09-25 Thread Joshua Shagam
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 04:47:09PM +0200, Torbjörn Andersson wrote: > Branden Robinson wrote: > > > * Yes, the shared memory extension is broken in recent phase2 packages. > > This is a recent development in upstream CVS. If you'd like to help fix > > it, subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and p

SV: READ THIS; Debian XFree86 4.0.1 mini-FAQ

2000-09-25 Thread Torbjörn Andersson
Branden Robinson wrote: > * Yes, the shared memory extension is broken in recent phase2 packages. > This is a recent development in upstream CVS. If you'd like to help fix > it, subscribe to xpert@xfree86.org and pursue the issue there; please try > to submit helpful bug reports to upstream

SV: READ THIS; Debian XFree86 4.0.1 mini-FAQ

2000-09-24 Thread Torbjörn Andersson
Branden Robinson wrote: > * Yes, the shared memory extension is broken in recent phase2 packages. > This is a recent development in upstream CVS. If you'd like to help fix > it, subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and pursue the issue there; please try > to submit helpful bug reports to upstrea