On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:59:03PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Xdm doesn't need that much data, though (note that it only reads gobs of
> data in the #ifndef DEV_RANDOM case; in other words, when it has a
> non-entropic source). I'm tempted to have it read from /dev/random and
> get real entr
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 10:45:25PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 10:21:18PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Edit xc/programs/xdm/Imakefile to:
> > * add DEV_RANDOM to the defines passed to the compiler ifdef
> > LinuxArchitecture
> > * add ArmArchitecture, IA64Architec
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 10:21:18PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Edit xc/programs/xdm/Imakefile to:
> * add DEV_RANDOM to the defines passed to the compiler ifdef
> LinuxArchitecture
> * add ArmArchitecture, IA64Architecture, and MipsArchitecture to the
> list to the list for those for which
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:55:21PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:35:11PM -0400, Mike Martin wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:15:12 +0200
> > Fair enough. I've replaced strace.xdm.txt with a new one.
> > MikeM
> Thanks a lot! The problem is in xdm's genauth.c sumFile fun
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:35:11PM -0400, Mike Martin wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:15:12 +0200
> Fair enough. I've replaced strace.xdm.txt with a new one.
> MikeM
Thanks a lot! The problem is in xdm's genauth.c sumFile function.
XDM reads blindly lot's of data from /dev/mem. When it hits the GIO
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:15:12 +0200
Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 11:39:04AM -0400, Mike Martin wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:23:18 +0200
> > Output of strace availible here:
> > http://overlord.linux-dude.com/strace.xdm.txt
> I think you need to call strac
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 11:39:04AM -0400, Mike Martin wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:23:18 +0200
> Output of strace availible here:
> http://overlord.linux-dude.com/strace.xdm.txt
I think you need to call strace with -f to trace the forks too.
-- Guido
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:23:18 +0200
Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Branden wrote:
> > If it's the same kernel bug I've seen on ia64 and heard about on ARM,
> > xdm is in a select().
>
> > Please do discuss this on this list. xdm doesn't even work for remote X
> > servers at present (
Branden wrote:
> If it's the same kernel bug I've seen on ia64 and heard about on ARM,
> xdm is in a select().
> Please do discuss this on this list. xdm doesn't even work for remote X
> servers at present (or, at least, the last time I looked at this).
Thanks for the pointer. Yes this might be t
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 12:41:48PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> thanks for the backtrace.
> [..snip..]
> > Process X (pid: -2011230548, stackpage=8a4c4000)
> This looks very weird...next thing to do would be to spot the place in
> xdm where it crashes the kernel(I already know i
Hi Martin,
thanks for the backtrace.
[..snip..]
> Process X (pid: -2011230548, stackpage=8a4c4000)
This looks very weird...next thing to do would be to spot the place in
xdm where it crashes the kernel(I already know it's before it forks the
X server) shall we take this off list, it's only mar
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 18:41:35 -0400
Mike Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an Indy (MIPS R4600SC) that dies when I run xdm
>
> There is a known bug that causes xdm to Oops the 2.4.X kernels. I would
> like to know if there is something I can do to help locate the cause of
> this proble
I have an Indy (MIPS R4600SC) that dies when I run xdm
There is a known bug that causes xdm to Oops the 2.4.X kernels. I would
like to know if there is something I can do to help locate the cause of
this problem. I understand a decoded Oops is what is needed. Can anyone
point me in the right d
13 matches
Mail list logo
