Re: X Strike Force: let's work on xfree86/branches/4.3.0/sid

2003-05-26 Thread Joel Baker
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 12:15:05AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 09:56:16AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > 3) Bug porters. > > I'd very much like to have port specialists as part of the "committing > team". NetBSD/i386 present and accounted for. First pass at 4.3.0 b

Re: X Strike Force: let's work on xfree86/branches/4.3.0/sid

2003-05-26 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 04:44:30PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > >> Cool. At some point soon I'll initialize a repo for this. Please nag > >> if I'm not moving fast enough. > > No problem :-) > > Perhaps I can not have enough time to work for X because I'm very > very busy on my real job s

Re: X Strike Force: let's work on xfree86/branches/4.3.0/sid

2003-05-26 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 04:44:30PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > Perhaps I can not have enough time to work for X because I'm very > very busy on my real job since 1st week of Jun, sorry. Sadly, my free time runs out about this week, until exams in 3 weeks have finished. After that, I've got 2

Re: X Strike Force: let's work on xfree86/branches/4.3.0/sid

2003-05-26 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 09:39:55AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: >> > - Xcursor package will be ITPd as soon as possible. >> > (Maintainer: X Strike force, Uploader Branden, Daniel and me). >> >> No point h

Re: X Strike Force: let's work on xfree86/branches/4.3.0/sid

2003-05-26 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 09:56:16AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 06:49:19PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > 1) Release 4.2.1-7 (it was on, then it was off, now it's on again). See > > http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/changelog?rev=44&content-type=te

Re: X Strike Force: let's work on xfree86/branches/4.3.0/sid

2003-05-26 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:41:32AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > Is it worth maintaining these packages (Xft, Xcursor, et al) under SVN > as well? Go here: http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ and click the little clickety thing under "Project Root" and to the left of "Go". -- G.

Re: X Strike Force: let's work on xfree86/branches/4.3.0/sid

2003-05-26 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 09:39:55AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > - Xcursor package will be ITPd as soon as possible. > (Maintainer: X Strike force, Uploader Branden, Daniel and me). No point having Daniel in the Uploaders field until he is a Debian Developer. > There is beta package:

Re: X Strike Force: let's work on xfree86/branches/4.3.0/sid

2003-05-25 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 09:39:55AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> There are several things still to do: > > >> 2) The xlibs bustup. Currently I envision: > >>* One shared lib, -dev, and -dbg package fo

Re: X Strike Force: let's work on xfree86/branches/4.3.0/sid

2003-05-25 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> There are several things still to do: >> 2) The xlibs bustup. Currently I envision: >> * One shared lib, -dev, and -dbg package for every shared >>library except those with a different upstream (fon

Re: X Strike Force: let's work on xfree86/branches/4.3.0/sid

2003-05-25 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 06:49:19PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > 1) Release 4.2.1-7 (it was on, then it was off, now it's on again). See > http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/changelog?rev=44&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup > for why. I think I can handle this, and LaM

Re: X Strike Force: let's work on xfree86/branches/4.3.0/sid

2003-05-25 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 06:49:19PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Hmm, I'm forgetting other things for my enumerated list at present. > Well, that's what discussion threads are for. Oh yeah, duh. 3) Import the upstream XFree86 CVS into the Subversion repo, if possible. The tool for this is "cv

X Strike Force: let's work on xfree86/branches/4.3.0/sid

2003-05-25 Thread Branden Robinson
Hi guys, Thanks to Daniel it looks like we now have a merger of all of our lines of development on 4.3.0. His laborious task of bringing these threads together is now capped by my largely symbolic act of creating xfree86/branches/4.3.0/sid and svn copying people/daniel/debian over to it, and maki