On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 08:17:09PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Fair enough, don't worry about it then.
> >
> > Well, I don't actually *like* to inconvenience buildd admins...
>
> I didn't mean to imply you did.
Didn't think you did. Just being
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Fair enough, don't worry about it then.
>
> Well, I don't actually *like* to inconvenience buildd admins...
I didn't mean to imply you did.
> I see. Perhaps I am being optimistic, but maybe all the buildd
> chroots have been updated to the requisi
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 05:38:28PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Oh, gah. Well, the main reason I went with this is because I'd still
> > like people to be able to build XFree86 with older GCCs.
>
> Fair enough, don't worry about it then.
Well, I do
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:51:26PM +, James Troup wrote:
>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> > +Build-Conflicts: cpp-3.3 (<< 1:3.3.3ds1-0pre1)
>>
>> FWIW, Build-Depends on a >> version are much more buildd (admin)
>> friendl
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:51:26PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> > +Build-Conflicts: cpp-3.3 (<< 1:3.3.3ds1-0pre1)
>
> FWIW, Build-Depends on a >> version are much more buildd (admin)
> friendly than a Build-Conflicts. The B-C isn't wrong, of cou
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > +Build-Conflicts: cpp-3.3 (<< 1:3.3.3ds1-0pre1)
FWIW, Build-Depends on a >> version are much more buildd (admin)
friendly than a Build-Conflicts. The B-C isn't wrong, of course, and
the unfriendliness of a B-C for buildd (admins) is arguably an s
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 10:41:22AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> I believe, we should drop 003a_damn_cpp_3.3_to_hell.diff patch
> with this change.
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 02:42:29AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Indeed, you will *have* to do so in order to get XFree86 to build again.
On S
X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +Build-Conflicts: cpp-3.3 (<< 1:3.3.3ds1-0pre1)
While that is indeed the version of the source package, the binary
package is versioned 1:3.3.3-0pre1:
Package: cpp-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.3-0pre1
Source: gcc-3.3 (1:3.3.3ds1-0pre1)
Her
(Branden Robinson wrote:)
>>> Modified:
>>>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
>>>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/control
>>> Log:
>>> Acknowledge the long-awaited unscrewing of GNU CPP's -traditional support.
>>> Remove build-dependency on cpp-3.2 (cpp is build-essential); add
>>> build-conflict
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Author: branden
>> Date: 2004-01-16 17:51:54 -0500 (Fri, 16 Jan 2004)
>> New Revision: 930
>>
>> Modified:
>>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
>>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/control
>> Log
Author: branden
Date: 2004-01-16 17:51:54 -0500 (Fri, 16 Jan 2004)
New Revision: 930
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/control
Log:
Acknowledge the long-awaited unscrewing of GNU CPP's -traditional support.
Remove build-dependency on cpp-3.2 (cpp is buil
11 matches
Mail list logo
