Re: XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-25 Thread Joey Hess
Branden Robinson wrote: I don't deviate from upstream practice gratuitously. shot type=cheapBut he said elsewhere in the thread that SuSE is shipping the lib shared, so../shot -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-25 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 08:48:50PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: Branden Robinson wrote: I don't deviate from upstream practice gratuitously. shot type=cheapBut he said elsewhere in the thread that SuSE is shipping the lib shared, so../shot Actually, a more up-to-date conspiracy theory would

Re: XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-25 Thread Joey Hess
Branden Robinson wrote: I don't deviate from upstream practice gratuitously. shot type=cheapBut he said elsewhere in the thread that SuSE is shipping the lib shared, so../shot -- see shy jo

Re: XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-13 Thread Waldemar Brodkorb
Hallo Charl, * Charl schrieb: On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 07:02:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: Why libXv.so is not integrated in the new pre-debs from Branden Robinson's site? Because the upstream build process

Re: XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-13 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 07:11:49PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: * Branden wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: Why libXv.so is not integrated in the new pre-debs from Branden Robinson's site? Because the upstream build process does not

Re: XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-13 Thread Waldemar Brodkorb
Hello Branden, * Branden wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: Why libXv.so is not integrated in the new pre-debs from Branden Robinson's site? Because the upstream build process does not compile a shared version. Xv is at present available only as a

Re: XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-13 Thread Waldemar Brodkorb
Hallo Charl, * Charl schrieb: On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 07:02:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: Why libXv.so is not integrated in the new pre-debs from Branden Robinson's site? Because the upstream build process

Re: XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-13 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 07:11:49PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: * Branden wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: Why libXv.so is not integrated in the new pre-debs from Branden Robinson's site? Because the upstream build process does not

Re: XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-12 Thread Charl P. Botha
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 07:02:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: Why libXv.so is not integrated in the new pre-debs from Branden Robinson's site? Because the upstream build process does not compile a shared version. Xv

Re: XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-12 Thread Charl P. Botha
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:08:42PM +1200, Carey Evans wrote: "Charl P. Botha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] ld --whole-archive -shared -o libXv.so libXv.a This tends to do the trick at least for livid (the last time I checked). Although you gain very little from doing this,

Re: XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-12 Thread Carey Evans
"Charl P. Botha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] ld --whole-archive -shared -o libXv.so libXv.a This tends to do the trick at least for livid (the last time I checked). Although you gain very little from doing this, since the code won't have been compiled with -fPIC. -- Carey

Re: XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-12 Thread Charl P. Botha
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 07:02:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: Why libXv.so is not integrated in the new pre-debs from Branden Robinson's site? Because the upstream build process does not compile a shared version. Xv

Re: XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-12 Thread Charl P. Botha
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:08:42PM +1200, Carey Evans wrote: Charl P. Botha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] ld --whole-archive -shared -o libXv.so libXv.a This tends to do the trick at least for livid (the last time I checked). Although you gain very little from doing this, since

Re: XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-12 Thread Carey Evans
Charl P. Botha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] ld --whole-archive -shared -o libXv.so libXv.a This tends to do the trick at least for livid (the last time I checked). Although you gain very little from doing this, since the code won't have been compiled with -fPIC. -- Carey Evans

XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-11 Thread Waldemar Brodkorb
Hello Debianfriends, Why libXv.so is not integrated in the new pre-debs from Branden Robinson's site? It is needed by applications like xine to view VCD or DVD in fullscreenmode. Thankz a lot for any response. cya Waldemar -- * Best MUA in the world: | (o_ * *

Re: XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-11 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: Why libXv.so is not integrated in the new pre-debs from Branden Robinson's site? Because the upstream build process does not compile a shared version. Xv is at present available only as a static library. It is needed by

XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-11 Thread Waldemar Brodkorb
Hello Debianfriends, Why libXv.so is not integrated in the new pre-debs from Branden Robinson's site? It is needed by applications like xine to view VCD or DVD in fullscreenmode. Thankz a lot for any response. cya Waldemar -- * Best MUA in the world: | (o_ * *

Re: XFree 4.0.3 debs

2001-04-11 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: Why libXv.so is not integrated in the new pre-debs from Branden Robinson's site? Because the upstream build process does not compile a shared version. Xv is at present available only as a static library. It is needed by