Dear Mark,
There has been some discussion recently on the Debian list devoted to
maintaining X (see CC) about the lack of a shared version of the Xv
library. There would appear to be an opinion that shared versions of
the libraries should be included.
Any chance you could drop a note to the
On 13 Apr 2001, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Dear Mark,
There has been some discussion recently on the Debian list devoted to
maintaining X (see CC) about the lack of a shared version of the Xv
library. There would appear to be an opinion that shared versions of
the libraries should be
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:53:54AM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
It's not an X-consortium standard, or even a de-facto standard.
If you have an app that links against Xv, it won't even start
unless you have the libraries on your machine. That would prohibit
using that app with anything
Dear Mark,
There has been some discussion recently on the Debian list devoted to
maintaining X (see CC) about the lack of a shared version of the Xv
library. There would appear to be an opinion that shared versions of
the libraries should be included.
Any chance you could drop a note to the
On 13 Apr 2001, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Dear Mark,
There has been some discussion recently on the Debian list devoted to
maintaining X (see CC) about the lack of a shared version of the Xv
library. There would appear to be an opinion that shared versions of
the libraries should be
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:53:54AM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
It's not an X-consortium standard, or even a de-facto standard.
If you have an app that links against Xv, it won't even start
unless you have the libraries on your machine. That would prohibit
using that app with anything other
6 matches
Mail list logo
