On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 02:54:08AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Thansk all for the comments.
>
> Since this is good info, I made a wiki page
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/PackageArchitectureAlmostAny
>
> based on the discussion here.
>
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 05:35:10PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>
Thansk all for the comments.
Since this is good info, I made a wiki page
http://wiki.debian.org/PackageArchitectureAlmostAny
based on the discussion here.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 05:35:10PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>
> > 4) wanna-build state dep-wait
> >
> > One option would be to put gs
> Now we have several overlapping mechanisms to avoid building packages
> on selected architectures. Worse, we don't have any proper instructions
> explaining which mechaism to use.
>
> 1) Architecture: list in package source
>
> This is what gsynaptics does now. wanna-build will still off
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi Luk,
>
> I wish things were such simple. Here is the root cause etc.
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 06:58:40PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Osamu Aoki wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Dear porter, please enlighten me.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:26:20PM +, Martin Guy wrote:
>
block 461088 by 461551
thanks
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 09:58:08PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > gsynaptics lists s390 as supported (Architecture: any) but
> > xserver-xorg-input-synaptics is not available. This leads to
> > uninstallable binary packages.
> > Bastian
> With serious tag and him bein
Hi Luk,
I wish things were such simple. Here is the root cause etc.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 06:58:40PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Dear porter, please enlighten me.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:26:20PM +, Martin Guy wrote:
> >> Package: gsynaptics
> >
6 matches
Mail list logo
