Re: description of fix for #230204 for clean-room reimplmentation

2004-04-23 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 08:36:19PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > > Around 16 o'clock on Apr 21, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > In the source file > > : > > I'll note that the version of KDKBDREP_ioctl_ok in X.Org CVS does: > > static int > KDKBDREP_ioctl_ok(int rate, int delay) { > #if defined(K

Re: description of fix for #230204 for clean-room reimplmentation

2004-04-21 Thread Keith Packard
Around 16 o'clock on Apr 21, Branden Robinson wrote: > In the source file > : I'll note that the version of KDKBDREP_ioctl_ok in X.Org CVS does: static int KDKBDREP_ioctl_ok(int rate, int delay) { #if defined(KDKBDREP) && !defined(__sparc__) /* This ioctl is defined in but is not

description of fix for #230204 for clean-room reimplmentation

2004-04-21 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 12:19:42PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > > Around 14 o'clock on Apr 21, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > Also, if there is a C programmer present who is willing to perform such > > a clean-room rewrite should it come to that, please speak up. > > I can do that. Here's a des