On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:24:24AM -0500, David Starner wrote:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:17:45AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 04:14:34PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases
for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 04:14:34PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases
for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's not correct, as EO isn't a valid country code
(if it is, we aren't using it as intended), but (Debian's) libc currently
supports
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:17:45AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 04:14:34PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases
for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's not correct, as EO isn't a valid country code
(if it is, we
Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases
for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's not correct, as EO isn't a valid country code
(if it is, we aren't using it as intended), but (Debian's) libc currently
supports eo_EO and not eo_XX, and since the short-term fix is easier for
X, I
4 matches
Mail list logo