Re: heads up: xserver 1.14 to unstable

2013-09-24 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 21:02 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 22:50:44 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 23:29 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > It doesn't build. The attached patch fixes that (and hopefully still > > > builds against 1.12), but I don't

Re: heads up: xserver 1.14 to unstable

2013-09-23 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 22:50:44 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 23:29 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > It doesn't build. The attached patch fixes that (and hopefully still > > builds against 1.12), but I don't know if that's enough to make it run. > > Ack, thanks. I'll run th

Re: heads up: xserver 1.14 to unstable

2013-09-22 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 21:27:13 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi all, > > the X Strike Force is getting ready to upload a newer xserver to > unstable. The current plan is to do that once systemd 204 reaches > testing, so probably in a week or two. Please let us know for each > non-XSF-maintai

Re: heads up: xserver 1.14 to unstable

2013-09-19 Thread Julien Viard de Galbert
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 09:27:13PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi all, > > the X Strike Force is getting ready to upload a newer xserver to > unstable. The current plan is to do that once systemd 204 reaches > testing, so probably in a week or two. Please let us know for each > non-XSF-mainta

Re: heads up: xserver 1.14 to unstable

2013-09-19 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2013-09-17 21:27, Julien Cristau wrote: > I notice that fglrx-driver, fglrx-legacy-driver and > nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx in sid don't declare support for the > new ABI. Is there a newer version of those? nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx probably won't see any updates from upstrea

Re: heads up: xserver 1.14 to unstable

2013-09-17 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 23:29 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 21:37:52 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 21:27 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > the X Strike Force is getting ready to upload a newer xserver to > > > unstable. The cur

Re: heads up: xserver 1.14 to unstable

2013-09-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 21:37:52 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 21:27 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > the X Strike Force is getting ready to upload a newer xserver to > > unstable. The current plan is to do that once systemd 204 reaches > > testing, so probab

Re: heads up: xserver 1.14 to unstable

2013-09-17 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 21:27 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi all, > > the X Strike Force is getting ready to upload a newer xserver to > unstable. The current plan is to do that once systemd 204 reaches > testing, so probably in a week or two. Please let us know for each > non-XSF-maintained dr

Re: heads up: xserver 1.14 to unstable

2013-09-17 Thread Felix Geyer
Hi, On 17.09.2013 21:27, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi all, > > the X Strike Force is getting ready to upload a newer xserver to > unstable. The current plan is to do that once systemd 204 reaches > testing, so probably in a week or two. Please let us know for each > non-XSF-maintained driver whet

heads up: xserver 1.14 to unstable

2013-09-17 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi all, the X Strike Force is getting ready to upload a newer xserver to unstable. The current plan is to do that once systemd 204 reaches testing, so probably in a week or two. Please let us know for each non-XSF-maintained driver whether you'll want to make a new source upload for the transiti