On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 09:30:19PM +0100, Petr Sebor wrote:
> I have got the orig source, patched with the r951 and the files touched
> by the patch I sent compiled ok
> (no warnings, no errors...)
>
> I can't verify at the momemt the code _still_ works, but it really did
> on a variety of CPUs
I have built r951 as specified in the previous email, and it seems to
have built successfully (no FTBFS).
I haven't been able to test the packages yet, but it was said that
the critical part was seeing that it built at all, which it did.
--
-><- Nick Rusnov
-><- http://nick.industrialmeats.com
Hello,
I have got the orig source, patched with the r951 and the files touched
by the patch I sent compiled ok
(no warnings, no errors...)
I can't verify at the momemt the code _still_ works, but it really did
on a variety of CPUs at the time
of submit to mesa 5.1 :-) The detection code was t
I just committed a patch which is supposed to fix #215831 (bad CPU
detection in Mesa), but as I develop on PowerPC, the most I have been
able to confirm is that the patch applies cleanly; non-x86 builds do not
traverse into the source directory that was modified.
If someone could at least verify t
4 matches
Mail list logo
