Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-16 Thread Ben Collins
> > Binary compatibility means you con run programs linked against older > > libraries. Guess what, X and the libX11 linked apps still work don't they? > > To me "binary compatible" means that, things act as they did before > ... when linked with the old library. Which includes being able to > "r

Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-16 Thread James Antill
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote: > > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I cannot link any more against libX

Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-16 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I cannot link any more against libX11.so: > > > > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined

Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-16 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I cannot link any more against libX11.so: > > > > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined

Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-16 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I cannot link any more against libX11.so: > > > > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefine

Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-16 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I cannot link any more against libX11.so: > > > > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefine

Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-16 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 09:02:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > To compile against a library built under an old glibc, the library > needs to be recompiled to the new libc. I think there's already a > forthcoming X 3.3.6 upgrade which will be rebuilt against woody glibc - > right, Branden? N

Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-16 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 09:02:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > To compile against a library built under an old glibc, the library > needs to be recompiled to the new libc. I think there's already a > forthcoming X 3.3.6 upgrade which will be rebuilt against woody glibc - > right, Branden?

Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-16 Thread James Antill
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I cannot link any more against libX11.so: > > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined reference to `getpwnam_r@@GLIBC_2.0' > > > > this shows, even if I link a mi

Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-15 Thread James Antill
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I cannot link any more against libX11.so: > > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined reference to `getpwnam_r@@GLIBC_2.0' > > > > this shows, even if I link a m

Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-15 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Johannes Zellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I cannot link any more against libX11.so: >> >> /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined reference to `getpwnam_r@@GLIBC_2.0' >> >> this shows, even if I link a minimal c program. >> >> my versions: >>

Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-15 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote: > Hello, > > I cannot link any more against libX11.so: > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined reference to `getpwnam_r@@GLIBC_2.0' > > this shows, even if I link a minimal c program. > > my versions: > ii xlib6g 3.3.6-

libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)

2000-10-15 Thread Johannes Zellner
Hello, I cannot link any more against libX11.so: /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined reference to `getpwnam_r@@GLIBC_2.0' this shows, even if I link a minimal c program. my versions: ii xlib6g 3.3.6-11 ii libc6 2.1.94-3 Any comments ? -- Johannes