> > Binary compatibility means you con run programs linked against older
> > libraries. Guess what, X and the libX11 linked apps still work don't they?
>
> To me "binary compatible" means that, things act as they did before
> ... when linked with the old library. Which includes being able to
> "r
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I cannot link any more against libX
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I cannot link any more against libX11.so:
> > >
> > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I cannot link any more against libX11.so:
> > >
> > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I cannot link any more against libX11.so:
> > >
> > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefine
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:10:03AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I cannot link any more against libX11.so:
> > >
> > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefine
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 09:02:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> To compile against a library built under an old glibc, the library
> needs to be recompiled to the new libc. I think there's already a
> forthcoming X 3.3.6 upgrade which will be rebuilt against woody glibc -
> right, Branden?
N
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 09:02:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> To compile against a library built under an old glibc, the library
> needs to be recompiled to the new libc. I think there's already a
> forthcoming X 3.3.6 upgrade which will be rebuilt against woody glibc -
> right, Branden?
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I cannot link any more against libX11.so:
> >
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined reference to `getpwnam_r@@GLIBC_2.0'
> >
> > this shows, even if I link a mi
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I cannot link any more against libX11.so:
> >
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined reference to `getpwnam_r@@GLIBC_2.0'
> >
> > this shows, even if I link a m
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Johannes Zellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I cannot link any more against libX11.so:
>>
>> /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined reference to `getpwnam_r@@GLIBC_2.0'
>>
>> this shows, even if I link a minimal c program.
>>
>> my versions:
>>
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:59:11AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I cannot link any more against libX11.so:
>
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined reference to `getpwnam_r@@GLIBC_2.0'
>
> this shows, even if I link a minimal c program.
>
> my versions:
> ii xlib6g 3.3.6-
Hello,
I cannot link any more against libX11.so:
/usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined reference to `getpwnam_r@@GLIBC_2.0'
this shows, even if I link a minimal c program.
my versions:
ii xlib6g 3.3.6-11
ii libc6 2.1.94-3
Any comments ?
--
Johannes
13 matches
Mail list logo