On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-04-02 09:44 +0200, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
>
>> I am running the nouveau driver now for the past couple of hours. I
>> can say that it works for a regular use. I tried glxinfo but it
>> segfaulted. The output is shown below.
>
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-04-02 09:44 +0200, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
>
>> I am running the nouveau driver now for the past couple of hours. I
>> can say that it works for a regular use. I tried glxinfo but it
>> segfaulted. The output is shown below.
>
On 2010-04-02 09:44 +0200, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
> I am running the nouveau driver now for the past couple of hours. I
> can say that it works for a regular use. I tried glxinfo but it
> segfaulted. The output is shown below.
>
> $ glxinfo
> name of display: :0.0
> Xlib: extension "GL
I am running the nouveau driver now for the past couple of hours. I
can say that it works for a regular use. I tried glxinfo but it
segfaulted. The output is shown below.
$ glxinfo
name of display: :0.0
Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0
Aioanei Rares (30/03/2010):
> Hi all, following this blog post [1] I tested the binary driver on
> my hardware [2] with the 2.6.32-4 kernel and it works just fine.
Hi, thanks for the feedback.
> Will also test with other kernels including vanilla and will keep
> you posted.
That probably won't
Hi all, following this blog post [1] I tested the binary driver on my
hardware [2] with the 2.6.32-4 kernel and it works just fine. Will also
test with other kernels including vanilla and will keep you posted.
[1] http://ikibiki.org//blog/2010/03/30/We_need_you/
[2] see attachment
[0.00
6 matches
Mail list logo