hi,
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:11:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Thank you so much for doing this! I will have more work for the ARM
> porting team soon, heh heh heh...
oh, let's hope i can cope with it :).
so long
Othmar
hi,
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:11:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Thank you so much for doing this! I will have more work for the ARM
> porting team soon, heh heh heh...
oh, let's hope i can cope with it :).
so long
Othmar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:53:15AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
[...]
> anyway, with the great help of Michel Daenzer I created a patch
> and it seems to fix it so far, it linked without any errors. what
> it does is simply to add a defined(__NetBSD__) to the #if which includes
> the include statem
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:53:15AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
[...]
> anyway, with the great help of Michel Daenzer I created a patch
> and it seems to fix it so far, it linked without any errors. what
> it does is simply to add a defined(__NetBSD__) to the #if which includes
> the include state
hi part 2,
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:53:15AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> furthermore, the arm .debs for X 4.2.1 are in
> ~othmar/public_html/xfree86_4.2.1-0pre1v2 on gluck if
> you want to use them for your X task force. or will be there
> shortly.
they are already there, so up for being used
Hi,
The problem with the link failure for arm is as follow:
in the chips driver there seems to be code which is for arm32 and
for NetBSD. somehow the person who wrote this just added a define
fro arm32, but not to check for __NetBSD__. furthermore the
actual include which provides function (sysar
hi part 2,
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:53:15AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> furthermore, the arm .debs for X 4.2.1 are in
> ~othmar/public_html/xfree86_4.2.1-0pre1v2 on gluck if
> you want to use them for your X task force. or will be there
> shortly.
they are already there, so up for being use
Hi,
The problem with the link failure for arm is as follow:
in the chips driver there seems to be code which is for arm32 and
for NetBSD. somehow the person who wrote this just added a define
fro arm32, but not to check for __NetBSD__. furthermore the
actual include which provides function (sysa
8 matches
Mail list logo
