On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 01:37:38AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> Patches will be submitted to the BTS tomorrow, barring sudden crisis in
> my life or other such catastrophe.
Beautiful. Thanks a lot for doing this.
> Now, on to making it package correctly...
Heh, there is *always* more work to do.
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 01:37:38AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> Patches will be submitted to the BTS tomorrow, barring sudden crisis in
> my life or other such catastrophe.
Beautiful. Thanks a lot for doing this.
> Now, on to making it package correctly...
Heh, there is *always* more work to do.
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 01:33:38PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> The good:
The better: I now have patches (against 4.2.1-1) to get a clean build on
netbsd-i386. Not yet tested extensively, but it *builds*.
> The bad:
That I need to arrange them into a sane set of patches and submit them,
yet. And..
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 01:33:38PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> The good:
The better: I now have patches (against 4.2.1-1) to get a clean build on
netbsd-i386. Not yet tested extensively, but it *builds*.
> The bad:
That I need to arrange them into a sane set of patches and submit them,
yet. And.
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 08:07:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 04:45:18PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> > > > @@ -356,0 +355 @@
> > > > +usr/X11R6/bin/kbd_mode
> > >
> > > I used to see this on Sun machines. You sure it's necessary with modern
> > > BSD kernels?
> >
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 04:45:18PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> > > @@ -356,0 +355 @@
> > > +usr/X11R6/bin/kbd_mode
> >
> > I used to see this on Sun machines. You sure it's necessary with modern
> > BSD kernels?
>
> I'm not sure it is. I mostly don't know where/how to check whether it is,
> o
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 08:07:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 04:45:18PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> > > > @@ -356,0 +355 @@
> > > > +usr/X11R6/bin/kbd_mode
> > >
> > > I used to see this on Sun machines. You sure it's necessary with modern
> > > BSD kernels?
> >
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 05:04:18PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 01:33:38PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> > The good:
> >
> > After a bit of banging on things to force the circular dependancy path
> > between freetype and xfree86, and cribbing from the patches written f
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 04:45:18PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> > > @@ -356,0 +355 @@
> > > +usr/X11R6/bin/kbd_mode
> >
> > I used to see this on Sun machines. You sure it's necessary with modern
> > BSD kernels?
>
> I'm not sure it is. I mostly don't know where/how to check whether it is,
>
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 01:33:38PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> The good:
>
> After a bit of banging on things to force the circular dependancy path
> between freetype and xfree86, and cribbing from the patches written for
> 4.1.0, I'm close (very close) to having a set of patches to make xfre
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 05:04:18PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 01:33:38PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> > The good:
> >
> > After a bit of banging on things to force the circular dependancy path
> > between freetype and xfree86, and cribbing from the patches written
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 01:33:38PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> The good:
>
> After a bit of banging on things to force the circular dependancy path
> between freetype and xfree86, and cribbing from the patches written for
> 4.1.0, I'm close (very close) to having a set of patches to make xfr
The good:
After a bit of banging on things to force the circular dependancy path
between freetype and xfree86, and cribbing from the patches written for
4.1.0, I'm close (very close) to having a set of patches to make xfree86
compile cleanly on the netbsd-i386 arch.
The bad:
It require
The good:
After a bit of banging on things to force the circular dependancy path
between freetype and xfree86, and cribbing from the patches written for
4.1.0, I'm close (very close) to having a set of patches to make xfree86
compile cleanly on the netbsd-i386 arch.
The bad:
It requir
14 matches
Mail list logo
