Re: xineramify_xscreensaver.diff?

2003-05-26 Thread Branden Robinson
[Not replying to JWZ since, despite accompanying it with bile, he did respect my request for no further private mail. I'll just address a couple of points for the benefit of bystanders on debian-x.] On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 02:57:04PM -0700, Jamie Zawinski wrote: > What is your fascination with no

Re: xineramify_xscreensaver.diff?

2003-05-26 Thread Jamie Zawinski
Branden Robinson wrote: > > If you read the message through a mail->news gateway, please identify > which one to the debian-x mailing list, since it is obviously obscuring > the source of the message and possibly other important information as > well. Well, you know, I was *going* to go search fo

Re: xineramify_xscreensaver.diff?

2003-05-26 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 02:01:27PM -0700, Jamie Zawinski wrote: > Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > [There was no need to mail me privately about this; the debian-x mailing > > list is a perfectly reasonable forum for such queries.] > > I'm not on the debian-x mailing list, nor was I even aware it

Re: xineramify_xscreensaver.diff?

2003-05-26 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 02:35:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 02:36:35AM -0700, Jamie Zawinski wrote: > > You wrote: > > > > > > - * debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_xineramify_xscreensaver.diff > > > (new): > > > -+ New patch from XFree86 HEAD to add Xinerama

Re: xineramify_xscreensaver.diff?

2003-05-26 Thread Branden Robinson
[There was no need to mail me privately about this; the debian-x mailing list is a perfectly reasonable forum for such queries.] On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 02:36:35AM -0700, Jamie Zawinski wrote: > You wrote: > > > > - * debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_xineramify_xscreensaver.diff (new): > > -