RE: [Declude.JunkMail] They are getting sneaky!

2002-08-22 Thread Charles Frolick
You probably could instead, make it add an additional X-Note: header that indicates postfix had to repair the headers and filter on this. It would not be a bad idea if all mail servers indicated when they had to repair broken headers. Chuck Frolick ArgoNet, Inc. -Original Message- From:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Headers

2002-08-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
>It seems like that the HEADERS tag does not trigger on Recipients. It checks the headers only -- which may or may not include the recipients, depending on whether they were in the To:, Cc: or Bcc: (if in the Bcc:, they won't be listed in the headers). Note that Declude JunkMail will scan th

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] They are getting sneaky!

2002-08-22 Thread Tom Baker | Netsmith Inc
The great thing about open-source, if it doesn't already do it, you can make it do it yourself. >From what I can tell examining the source, there is no config variable that will control this behavior. If you are more advanced you could probably write in your own variable so you can toggle it via

[Declude.JunkMail] Headers

2002-08-22 Thread Kami Razvan
Title: Message Hi;   It seems like that the HEADERS tag does not trigger on Recipients.  Or may be it does but in this case it was not (somehow) detected.   The X-Note: Recipient(s): shows two emails (materials & material) that are listed in our filter file with scores of 10.  This SPAM shou