I'm hoping the following features would be added to Declude:
Message variable:
-
XNOTE: %WEIGHTCOUNT% = What value did the message fail with
Junkmail action:
WEIGHT10CFOLDER c:\WEIGHT10 (copy t
ailure of all Identifiers: 1551
Total Percent of ID effectiveness: 59%
List of spammers caught by the kill file:
found: 17 ID-20020930-000139 .transcentives.net
found: 16 ID-20020930-000170 @dealsindemand.com
found: 15 ID-20020930-000434 .torpedomail.com
found:
Scott,
Thanks very much.
George
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MAILTO Filter Request
>There was a question last month (8/2
I mentioned a few weeks ago that our netblock has been listed on SPEWS
because our ISP is "Spam Friendly".
Anyway... I was going to setup a Smarthost/SMTP gateway on a different
network but wanted to know what impact Junkmail might have on that.
With regard to Rev DNS records and MX Records, do
Does the Fromfile check the 'reply to' SMTP address or the FQDN of the
SMTP server in the SMTP header or both?
IOW, if the reply to address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] but the SMTP header
says that the SMTP server was smtp1.inalarm.com.mx can I enter
.inalarm.com.mx in my from file?
---
[This E-mail sc
>Does the Fromfile check the 'reply to' SMTP address or the FQDN of the
>SMTP server in the SMTP header or both?
It just checks the "return address" (the "MAIL FROM" from the SMTP
envelope, where bounce messages go).
>IOW, if the reply to address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] but the SMTP header
>says
>I mentioned a few weeks ago that our netblock has been listed on SPEWS
>because our ISP is "Spam Friendly".
>
>Anyway... I was going to setup a Smarthost/SMTP gateway on a different
>network but wanted to know what impact Junkmail might have on that.
Assuming that Declude JunkMail is running on
>It would also be great if you could consider adding a stop test
>consideration.
This (and stopping when a certain weight is reached) are in the suggestion
database.
Given that performance is rarely an issue with Declude JunkMail, it isn't a
high priority right now, but it is something that w
> Assuming that Declude JunkMail is running on the existing
> IMail server (and
> not the Smarthost), there isn't anything special you would need to do.
The way we're currently configured, we have Junkmail running on iMail
just as an inbound filter.
All inbound SMTP traffic hits iMail/Junkmail
> In this case, you would need to enter [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> @bellsouth.net. Alternatively, you could use a filter that
> filters on the
> HELO/EHLO text, that filters for ".inalarm.com.mx".
Could you have both filters read from the same 'fromfile'?
What's the syntax to setup the HELO/EHLO
> > In this case, you would need to enter [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> > @bellsouth.net. Alternatively, you could use a filter that
> > filters on the
> > HELO/EHLO text, that filters for ".inalarm.com.mx".
>
>Could you have both filters read from the same 'fromfile'?
The "fromfile" test type just ch
> > Assuming that Declude JunkMail is running on the existing
> > IMail server (and
> > not the Smarthost), there isn't anything special you would need to do.
>
>I'd like to forward all outbound SMTP traffic from Exchange back to
>iMail and then have iMail act as the SmartHost.
In that case, you
>I'm hoping the following features would be added to Declude:
>
>
>Message variable:
>-
>XNOTE: %WEIGHTCOUNT% = What value did the message fail with
There is a %WEIGHT% variable that will display the total weight for the
ffectiveness: 59%
List of spammers caught by the kill file:
found: 17 ID-20020930-000139 .transcentives.net
found: 16 ID-20020930-000170 @dealsindemand.com
found: 15 ID-20020930-000434 .torpedomail.com
found: 4 ID-20020930-000373 @yourbigvote.com
f
Hello,
what must be wrong that make a mail fail the routing tests?
I'm getting many of them, most from inside of Germany.
And nothing really strange about them.
Alex
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declud
>what must be wrong that make a mail fail the routing tests?
>
>I'm getting many of them, most from inside of Germany.
>
>And nothing really strange about them.
Given the way that test works, it doesn't work well if your mailserver is
located in a country that isn't among the countries that sen
I have SNIFFER tests set to alert.
I've found that the user will receive the alert even if they are in the
whitelist?
Is this normal or do I have something mis-configured?
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Proto Virus Scanner]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (h
> In a filter, you could use a line such as:
>
> HELO 0 ENDSWITH .inalarm.com.mx
>
> as well as:
>
> MAILFROM 0 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I haven't used any of the filters yet
I assume that these entries go in the Global.cfg file?
Is there anyway to place all of them i
>I have SNIFFER tests set to alert.
I wouldn't recommend that -- the SNIFFER test catches mostly spam, and
spammers typically use valid E-mail addresses less than 1% of the
time. That means that for each pseudo-bounce message that gets back to the
spammer, you're using resources to send 100
>I haven't used any of the filters yet
>I assume that these entries go in the Global.cfg file?
It's best to read up about them before using them. :) The "filtering"
section of the manual covers this.
>Is there anyway to place all of them in an external file and apply the
>same weight/rul
Thanks!...
I'm off to RTFM. :)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R.
> Scott Perry
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 11:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile blacklist question.
>
>
>
> >I have
Ok, I am now back in the office.
There were two deccon.exe in task manager.
There was one Declude Console window open as expected.
There was a error window open that said the following:
"Couldn;t create file map2; already exist."
That is the exact message, including punctuation marks, except
One question about filters...
You assign the rule in the Global.cfg file a weight.
You also assign each filter a weight.
Are these two weights added to get the final weight for the message?
For example, if you have:
MYFILTER filter c:\iMail\Declude\myfilter.txt x 5 0
And in \myf
>One question about filters...
>
>You assign the rule in the Global.cfg file a weight.
>You also assign each filter a weight.
>
>Are these two weights added to get the final weight for the message?
>
>For example, if you have:
>
>MYFILTER filter c:\iMail\Declude\myfilter.txt x 5 0
>
>There were two deccon.exe in task manager.
>
>There was one Declude Console window open as expected.
>
>There was a error window open that said the following:
>
>"Couldn;t create file map2; already exist."
>
>That is the exact message, including punctuation marks, except the
>quotes.
That's a m
How can I tell what version of deccon.exe I am running now?
Is there an outstanding benefit to upgrading to the latest
version? Other than the grammar upgrades ;-)
I'm currently running Declude 1.61.
Douglas
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf O
>How can I tell what version of deccon.exe I am running now?
The Declude console does not have a version number.
>Is there an outstanding benefit to upgrading to the latest
>version? Other than the grammar upgrades ;-)
>I'm currently running Declude 1.61.
If you do not see that "Couldn;t creat
OK, that did it.
Comments/questions:
Could you include version information, both in the About box and in the
file properties? This would make it easy to identify which version is
being run, and can be compared to the latest version.
You have a Help button on the menu, why not just remove it?
I
>Comments/questions:
>
>Could you include version information, both in the About box and in the
>file properties? This would make it easy to identify which version is
>being run, and can be compared to the latest version.
That's because until recently there haven't been any versions of the
Decl
>Unfortunately, we just don't have the resources right now to do that.
Understood. Feature request? :))
>It might be possible to have the deccon.exe file loaded at startup
somehow
>(there has been talk on the IMail_Forum recently about starting
processes
>when the system starts up for other re
> >Unfortunately, we just don't have the resources right now to do that.
>
>Understood. Feature request? :))
Yes. :)
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsub
FWIW, I don't know if it will work, but there is an application called
"Firedaemon" that will install almost any executable file as a Windows
Service. It is extremely versatile and easy.
Check it out at http://www.firedaemon.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Scott,
When you do get to consider this please think about something like STOP
to stop testing further in the individual filter or test, and STOPALL to
stop all further testing.
Thanks,
George
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott
> Is there any criteria to get listed on your list? I have noticed over
> the last couple of weeks that more and more sites that I would have
> thought would be legitimate are being listed?
If they spam me and our users they will more than likely be blacklisted.
However, if the site is an ISP or
> There is a %WEIGHT% variable that will display the total weight
> for the E-mail.
Ok, sounds good.
> HOLD action so that a directory can be specified, and adding a new action
> to copy the E-mail to another directory).
Can't wait.
> There already is a MAILFROM filter type...
Sorry I meant
> > There already is a MAILFROM filter type...
>
>Sorry I meant to say MAILTO
That will be available in the next release ("ALLRECIPS", to match the
%ALLRECIPS% variable name).
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declud
Below is a second mailing that I received from these people, I posted the
first one to the IMAIL forum. They claim someone is "Joe-jobing" them, but
I do notice that on their explanation page they are still advertising their
services. That makes me suspicious.I've included the header and the
When Imail receives a message, it is set to copy all to a ruleprocess
account. This account is only used for running a rules.ima, like for
archiving some users and such.
However, Declude is seeing this as a second to address and running all
scans twice.
Is there a way to tell Declude not to scan
>When Imail receives a message, it is set to copy all to a ruleprocess
>account. This account is only used for running a rules.ima, like for
>archiving some users and such.
>
>However, Declude is seeing this as a second to address ...
That's because IMail has changed the E-mail so that there are
Standard version here.
:(
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROT
>Standard version here.
Unfortunately, the Standard version treats all E-mail addresses the same,
including "copied" ones.
One idea would be to have the copied mail sent to an address on a separate
domain, and set up a per-domain configuration for that domain.
Another would be to have it for
Hi,
I have From:, To:, Subject: in all of my .eml files and a blank line after subject
then body follows.
Somehow, sender's postmaster receives a warning and not the recipient nor the sender.
I am using declude v 1.60. Do you have any other idea?
Thank you
Hideki
-Original Messag
42 matches
Mail list logo