Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Not caught by all lines

2003-02-25 Thread Dan Patnode
This is one of the reasons I build most of my filters in Excel. I drag down all particulars (like CONTAINS) from the cells above and it instantly and accurately fills, without typing. Drag & drop the offending phrase from the spam and its a spot on match every time. Not that I don't make erro

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Image'fx SFMNG

2003-02-25 Thread John Tolmachoff
> > Tom, any plans to update this program for more than 200 addresses? > > Yes, however, the limit is 500. The program may say 200 but it is > and should be 500. Thanks Tom. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com -

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Image'fx SFMNG

2003-02-25 Thread Tom
> Tom, any plans to update this program for more than 200 addresses? Yes, however, the limit is 500. The program may say 200 but it is and should be 500. Regards, Tom Image`fx --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Decl

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Question

2003-02-25 Thread David Delbridge
Right. So, when it's not there, your weight has been reduced. When it is there, your weight is unchanged. Granted, the logic is kinda backwards, but it does answer your question without having to dissect the logs. Am I missing something? Dave Charles Frolick wrote: > > Not when it passes, wh

[Declude.JunkMail] Image'fx SFMNG

2003-02-25 Thread John Tolmachoff
Tom, any plans to update this program for more than 200 addresses? John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Question

2003-02-25 Thread Charles Frolick
Not when it passes, which is when it has an effect on weight. Chuck Frolick ArgoNet, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Delbridge Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Intere

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Question

2003-02-25 Thread David Delbridge
Shows up in MY %FAILEDTESTS% just fine: X-RBL-Warning: BADHEADERS: This E-mail was sent from a broken mail client [802c]. X-RBL-Warning: HELOBOGUS: Domain S1001EXM01.macromedia.com has no MX or A records. X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 63.109.193.64 with no reverse

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Not caught by all lines

2003-02-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
> >I do not understand. It should have been caught by line 43 which is "BODY > >20 CONTIANShttp://links2";. That is in the body of the message, > >not the links. > > You almost got me. Although the E-mail contains "http://links2";, it does > not contian "http://links2";. :) I must

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Not caught by all lines

2003-02-25 Thread John Tolmachoff
> Look at the "BODY 20 CONTIANS..." line above with the new glasses. What's > that rule again? "I" before "A", except after "T"? John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by D

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Not caught by all lines

2003-02-25 Thread John Tolmachoff
> >I do not understand. It should have been caught by line 43 which is "BODY > >20 CONTIANShttp://links2";. That is in the body of the message, > >not the links. > > You almost got me. Although the E-mail contains "http://links2";, it does > not contian "http://links2";. :) I must

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Not caught by all lines

2003-02-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
I do not understand. It should have been caught by line 43 which is "BODY 20 CONTIANShttp://links2";. That is in the body of the message, not the links. You almost got me. Although the E-mail contains "http://links2";, it does not contian "http://links2";. :)

[Declude.JunkMail] So Far So Good!

2003-02-25 Thread Robert Forsyth
24 hours with declude and 2900 emails stopped! Awesome product! Robert Forsyth Director of Internet Operations ABC 7/Newschannel 8 703-236-9580 (direct) 703-236-9259 (fax) --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://ww

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Not caught by all lines

2003-02-25 Thread John Tolmachoff
> I'm guessing the problem is that much of the text is within the .jpg > files. Declude JunkMail won't see that. I do not understand. It should have been caught by line 43 which is "BODY 20 CONTIANShttp://links2";. That is in the body of the message, not the links. --=_BkymKzPF_

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Not caught by all lines

2003-02-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
Here is a message that was caught by a filter but only one line. It should have been caught by 2 lines. Why not? I'm guessing the problem is that much of the text is within the .jpg files. Declude JunkMail won't see that. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for v

[Declude.JunkMail] Not caught by all lines

2003-02-25 Thread John Tolmachoff
Here is a message that was caught by a filter but only one line. It should have been caught by 2 lines. Why not? grayfilter3.txt zipped and attached. 02/25/2003 11:12:53 Qc03303f100cca771 Triggered CONTAINS filter on links [weight->1; links2.exclusivepremiere.com/c]. 02/25/2003 11:12:53 Qc03303f1

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Question

2003-02-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
Since IPNOTINMX only has use when it passes, there is no way to add a header using WARN, and it doesn't show up in %FAILEDTESTS% (obviously), so the problem is, it adjusts the weight but unless you go to the log file, you don't know for shure it did. Is there a way to make it show up in the heade

[Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Question

2003-02-25 Thread Charles Frolick
Scott, Since IPNOTINMX only has use when it passes, there is no way to add a header using WARN, and it doesn't show up in %FAILEDTESTS% (obviously), so the problem is, it adjusts the weight but unless you go to the log file, you don't know for shure it did. Is there a way to make it show up in th