Scott, just wondering why these new tests use "*" instead of "x" for the
undefined variables. I tried using "x" and the results were not good. I
haven't tried using "*" yet, but will if that is what the undefined
variables should be for these new tests.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "R
I think is fixes someting I found the other day
The option AUTOWHITELIST ON was doing a partial match on emails stored on
the imail server in the users address book aliases.txt so when an email was
sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that was also in the aliases.txt it was auto
white listing [EMAIL PROTEC
Same thing here
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Baumbach
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: * [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta) released
WARNING do not use the new test SUBJE
WARNING do not use the new test SUBJECTSPACES
On my system is causes Declude.exe to load and stay loaded in the task
manager using 100% of the CPU time causing my computer to come to a stop.
In just a matter of a few minutes I had over 50 copies of Declude.exe
running and you can not kill "en
I have the line
NONENGLISH nonenglish x x 10 0
and
nonenglish attach
Defined but still getting spam that has non-english headers
I have weight10 defined as attached
Am I missing something?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This
Scott,
It says in the release notes for 1.68:
Whitelist files will now work as exact matches, rather than partial matches
Does this mean that if we have whitelistfile in the default.junkmail file that we
need to have the exact match (email addresses) to let through. For example, o
I personally would like to see some examples and more details on how to
implement new test when you email a notice like this announcing them.
That's what this list is for. :)
The "nonenglish" test type will detect E-mails that are not in English
(specifically, ones that are using foreign charac
Scott
I personally would like to see some examples and more details on how to
implement new test when you email a notice like this announcing them.
I know it is a beta and after release you will add info to the manual but
until then I am not sure how to setup or use new tests.
Just a sugge
So - how about you could distinguish between real FAILURES (e.g., NOT
including the whitelist and not include total weights that are equal/less
than 0), e.g. a %TESTSRESULT% variable that inserts the string "PASSED"
(if whitelisted or total weight <= 0) or the string "FAILED" in any other
case t
I use
GLOBAL.CFG
WHITETEXT filter D:\IMail\Declude\White_Text.txt x0 0
White_Text.txt
MAILFROM -20 CONTAINS @reply.yahoo.com
MAILFROM -20 CONTAINS @returns.groups.yahoo.com
change the -20 for your needs
the FROM of the email is from the sender but the true sender is
X-Declude-Sender: @retur
We have just released Declude JunkMail v1.68 (beta). See
http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm . Notable changes since the
last beta include:
o Fixes an issue where the 'comments' test type would catch
comments that shouldn't have been caught.
o MAILFROM and HELOBOGUS tes
Hi Scott:
My client try to rely on filtering by looking at the header that I insert
with declude:
XINHEADER X-Declude: Version %VERSION%; %QUEUENAME% from
%REVDNS% [%REMOTEIP%]
XINHEADER X-Declude: Failed %TESTSFAILED% [%WEIGHT%]
XINHEADER X-Countries: %C
I thought the DNS result inside the X-Note was essentially the same as a
traceroute?
Yes, the DNS result in the "X-Note: This E-mail was sent from %REVDNS%
([%REMOTEIP%])" header is the reverse DNS entry, which is the same as what
you would see in a traceroute (at the last hop in the traceroute
I thought the DNS result inside the X-Note was essentially the same as a traceroute?
Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator
VantageMed Operations (Kansas City)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole
use of the
intended r
Didn't find this in the archives. Recently I'm seeing more of this:
"X-Note: This Email sent from
(timeout)". Is there somewhere I can tinker with a setting that will
lengthen the time it takes DNS
to time out?
In this case, the problem is most likely that your DNS server isn't
responding with
Didn't find this in the archives. Recently I'm seeing more of this: "X-Note: This
Email sent from
(timeout)". Is there somewhere I can tinker with a setting that will lengthen the time
it takes DNS
to time out?
Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator
VantageMed Operations (Kansas City)
Email:
16 matches
Mail list logo
