RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible exploit on mail server

2003-03-31 Thread Keith Purtell
Thanks all for the advice. Ran some tests, and discovered our former firewall (which had firmware issues) was detached and never reconnected. We're installing another firewall. Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible exploit on mail server

2003-03-31 Thread SECURITY
I had this happen also several times, about 2 months ago, I did everything you mentioned below. A friend had me download a utility called spybot, which found a cookie in my internet explorer that launches popup ad's automatically. Once I removed this, I haven't seen any since. http://spybot.safer-n

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible exploit on mail server

2003-03-31 Thread R. Scott Perry
Don't know if this is related to spam or not... This morning I logged onto the NT4 server where we host both our web and mail server. Immediately noticed a Messenger Service box (like you get with "net send" from dos prompt) containing a typical spam message (edited): "From our Research Dept ..

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible exploit on mail server

2003-03-31 Thread John Tolmachoff
And it is Spam, not a hack. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Purtell > Sent: Monday, March 3

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible exploit on mail server

2003-03-31 Thread John Tolmachoff
Most likely cause is open ports 137-139 from Internet or Messenger programs. (MS Messenger, AOL Messenger, Yahoo messenger.) John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible exploit on mail server

2003-03-31 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Yep, it's a known "feature". The deal is that although you may be blocking NetBIOS on your firewall, you can do a programmatically do a "net send" to port 135, which you can't unbind from your external NIC. You need to firewall your machine to cut off this unwanted ingress. Doubly so because of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible exploit on mail server

2003-03-31 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> Don't know if this is related to spam or not... This morning I > logged onto the NT4 server where we host both our web and mail > server. Immediately noticed a Messenger Service box (like you get > with "net send" from dos prompt) containing a typical spam message > (edited): "F

Re: NOABUSE:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail v8.0 and Declude Jinkmail??

2003-03-31 Thread William Baumbach
Yes IMail does use Symantec's Norton Anti-Virus Yes my desktop client software was also Symantec's Norton Anti-Virus I too was very surprised to find that imail let emails with viruses pass through on a regular bases and the desktop client anit-virus was detecting it. I called Imail support and t

[Declude.JunkMail] Possible exploit on mail server

2003-03-31 Thread Keith Purtell
Don't know if this is related to spam or not... This morning I logged onto the NT4 server where we host both our web and mail server. Immediately noticed a Messenger Service box (like you get with "net send" from dos prompt) containing a typical spam message (edited): "From our Research Dept ...

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] More Selective Whitelist-TO

2003-03-31 Thread R. Scott Perry
I may be off-base here, but I would imagine this could work: This is one of several methods we are investigating. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To u

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] More Selective Whitelist-TO

2003-03-31 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hm, Scott: I may be off-base here, but I would imagine this could work: A) Declude inspects the D... and Q... File, correct? B) once Declude decides, that there is a "TO" whitelist for a particular email, it will determine if the "Q" file lists more than one "R" line (Recipient). C) if there is

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist

2003-03-31 Thread R. Scott Perry
I know that this may have been covered in previous posts, but I wanted to cover this topic again. (I may even have discussed this myself). I have some users that have requested that they receive everything so I have had their accounts whitelisted (WHITELIST TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]). I also have b

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist

2003-03-31 Thread James Colunio
Greetings, I know that this may have been covered in previous posts, but I wanted to cover this topic again. (I may even have discussed this myself). I have some users that have requested that they receive everything so I have had their accounts whitelisted (WHITELIST TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]). I a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Slipped by JunkMail - JunkmailError 5 Error 5

2003-03-31 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, I got the same one. Do you need the files to verify? No. This is a known issue with some of the older v1.68 interim releases. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Slipped by JunkMail - Junkmail Error 5 Error 5

2003-03-31 Thread John Tolmachoff
> There is now a new interim release at > http://www.declude.com/release/168i/declude.exe that attempts to address > this problem, but will add extra logging information in case it continues. Scott, I got the same one. Do you need the files to verify? 03/28/2003 01:32:38 Q16ae04cd0082b4dc Msg fai