[Declude.JunkMail] Reading junkmail log files

2003-10-10 Thread Todd Holt
Is there white paper on reading the junkmail log files? Like the one that someone created on reading IMail logs. Thanks, Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- [This E-

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Dictionary attacks --- anyone have any solutions.

2003-10-10 Thread Todd Holt
I have a customer using Outlook Express 6 and each message he sends fails the HELOBOGUS test as shown below: 10/10/2003 14:45:30 Q28770c310140cd76 HELOBOGUS:6 . Total weight = 6 10/10/2003 14:45:30 Q28770c310140cd76 Msg failed HELOBOGUS (Domain TONY has no MX or A records.). Action=HEADER. 10/10/

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail 8x VERIFY THE MAIL FROM

2003-10-10 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi; Yes we have been using it for a while.. With success. This is our filter. HEADERS 12 CONTAINS X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALFROM HEADERS 5 CONTAINS X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALHELO HEADERS 12 CONTAINS X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALREVDNS We have set i

[Declude.JunkMail] IMail 8x VERIFY THE MAIL FROM

2003-10-10 Thread Danny Klopfer
Is anyone using the "VERIFY THE MAIL FROM" and "VERIFY THE EHLO/HELO DOMAIN" features in Imail 8.x before running Declude with sucess? --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] External whitelist filter

2003-10-10 Thread Keith Anderson
> You should never find an "@" in a REVDNS response, so the > above entry would > be useless. Good point. Thanks --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-ma

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] External whitelist filter

2003-10-10 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: "Keith Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I've got it working now as a filter with these types of entries: > > revdns -900 endswith .domain.com > revdns -900 endswith @domain.com You should never find an "@" in a REVDNS response, so the above entry would be us

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Alligate

2003-10-10 Thread brian
This is correct. We stopped offering the IMail specific (non Declude) version of Alligate a couple of months ago. We have also suspended free trials of the Declude add-in until we can bring it up to date so that the same detection methods are used by both the Declude version and our gateway versi

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Dictionary attacks --- anyone have any solutions.

2003-10-10 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi Chuck: We have done that and it works great for us. We have designed a database that all spam data goes in there. All filter parameters are entered in a relational table. We have a script that downloads various queries into text files and then they are copied on a schedule in the IMail direc

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Dictionary attacks --- anyone have any solutions.

2003-10-10 Thread Chuck Schick
Thanks Scott: The reason blocking IPs is not the answer is because I would have to spend 24 hours a day doing it. Also Imail's control access list is just a list of IPs. It would be nice if the list was part of a database where you could put dates and reasons for blacklisting IPs - Chuck Schick

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] External whitelist filter

2003-10-10 Thread Keith Anderson
> That's the WHITELISTFILE option -- but, it won't work with > reverse DNS entries yet. For that, you can > use a filter, with negative weights. I've got it working now as a filter with these types of entries: revdns -900 endswith .domain.com revdns -900 endswith @domain.com mailfrom -9

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Dictionary attacks --- anyone have any solutions.

2003-10-10 Thread Frederick Samarelli
I use BlackIce server. Give me an idea as to what to look for and I will tell you if it is working. Fred - Original Message - From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 12:23 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Dictionary attacks ---

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ERROR: SOMEONE CRUMBLED MY MAGIC COOKIE

2003-10-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
I am on version 1.76i5 I have been getting this error for many months, yes even back on verison 1.6x the error happens to every email that reaches the action weight of DELETE Could you type "\IMail\Declude -diag" from a command prompt to double-check that you are actually on 1.76i5? There was a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Disclaimer/confidentiality agreement.

2003-10-10 Thread Frederick Samarelli
I was thinking more in the line of a item we sign sand send to the customer. Some info to include "Email Scan and Forward Polices. We are committed to honoring the privacy of our users and visitors. We never sell or make available individual names, lists of users, or aggregate data to any third

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] External whitelist filter

2003-10-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
Could someone post an example of an external filter used as a replacement for the GLOBAL.CFG whitelist entries? Most specifically, the REVDNS entries... I can't seem to get the right thing working. I'm still new at this. That's the WHITELISTFILE option -- but, it won't work with reverse DNS ent

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Dictionary attacks --- anyone have any solutions.

2003-10-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
We are constantly getting hammered with dictionary attacks. Does anyone have any solutions? Does the new version of Imail address this issue? Whenever I check a lot of it comes from open proxies. Blocking the IPs is not a solution. Any ideas are appreciated. Blocking the IPs is the only solutio

[Declude.JunkMail] Alligate

2003-10-10 Thread William Baumbach
FYI -Original Message- From: Brian Milburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 12:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Alligate Information Request Hi, Thanks for your interest in Alligate for IMail. We have decided we are no longer going to offer an I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Disclaimer/confidentiality agreement.

2003-10-10 Thread William Baumbach
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this email is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all paper a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] External whitelist filter

2003-10-10 Thread Keith Anderson
Terrific, thank you. > -Original Message- > From: DLAnalyzer Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 9:48 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] External whitelist filter > > > This is what I use and I have been very pleased with the resu

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] External whitelist filter

2003-10-10 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
This is what I use and I have been very pleased with the results.. Global.cfg entry REVERSEWEIGHTDNS filter x:\IMail\Declude\ReverseDNSFilter.txt x 0 0 Sample File Contents REVDNS -3 ENDSWITH .kodak.com REVDNS -3 ENDSWITH .mx.aol.com REVDNS -3 ENDSWITH .dell.com Hope this

[Declude.JunkMail] Dictionary attacks --- anyone have any solutions.

2003-10-10 Thread Chuck Schick
We are constantly getting hammered with dictionary attacks. Does anyone have any solutions? Does the new version of Imail address this issue? Whenever I check a lot of it comes from open proxies. Blocking the IPs is not a solution. Any ideas are appreciated. Chuck Schick Warp 8, Inc. 303-421-5

[Declude.JunkMail] Disclaimer/confidentiality agreement.

2003-10-10 Thread Frederick Samarelli
Does anyone have a good disclaimer/confidentiality agreement they would like to share. I offering Email and Scan/forward services. Recently I have been asked for a copy of our disclaimer/confidentiality agreement. Not wanting to re-invent the wheel I am asking the list to see if someone would lik

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ERROR: SOMEONE CRUMBLED MY MAGIC COOKIE

2003-10-10 Thread William Baumbach
Scott I am on version 1.76i5 I have been getting this error for many months, yes even back on verison 1.6x the error happens to every email that reaches the action weight of DELETE see attached the two files .GPx files form c:\ and my two Config files and part of log file Sincerely, William

[Declude.JunkMail] External whitelist filter

2003-10-10 Thread Keith Anderson
Could someone post an example of an external filter used as a replacement for the GLOBAL.CFG whitelist entries? Most specifically, the REVDNS entries... I can't seem to get the right thing working. I'm still new at this. Thanks --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Null Sender

2003-10-10 Thread Roger Heath
Reply to: R. Scott Perry Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Null Sender on Friday 8:03:42 AM Ah, thanks! -- Roger Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.rleeheath.com - Copy of Original Message(s): - >>Would this work if it is '<>' as it most commonly is? Then it is >>truly not blank... I think Block

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Null Sender

2003-10-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
Would this work if it is '<>' as it most commonly is? Then it is truly not blank... I think Block Null Sender covers this instance. It would be nice to have an alternative that was RFC compliant. It would probably be best to use both: MAILFROM 2 ISBLANK and MAILFROM 2 IS <> That way, whic

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] maybe its just one of AOL's servers???

2003-10-10 Thread Joshua Levitsky
On Oct 9, 2003, at 10:46 PM, Frederick Samarelli wrote: The message was sent from a process AOL has to notify ip subnet owners when someone complains about an email sent to an AOL user. What you see is what I get all the time from AOL. I can give you my AOL contact if you like. Actually what wo

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Null Sender

2003-10-10 Thread Roger Heath
Reply to: R. Scott Perry Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Null Sender on Friday 7:16:33 AM Would this work if it is '<>' as it most commonly is? Then it is truly not blank... I think Block Null Sender covers this instance. It would be nice to have an alternative that was RFC compliant. -- Roger Heath

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Integrity Checker

2003-10-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
So HELO of Micorosoft.com should only be allowed if REVDNS is also Microsoft and email is Microsoft.com. Or can we do this already? That sounds like it would be a good extension to the SPAMDOMAINS test (which checks for return address and reverse DNS matches).

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Null Sender

2003-10-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there anyway to assign points to a null sender? Most null sender emails I get are spam and was wondering if I could assign a point value to null sender? I believe you could set up a filter, and add this line to the filter file: MAILFROM 2 ISBLANK

[Declude.JunkMail] Null Sender

2003-10-10 Thread Bennie
Scott,   Is there anyway to assign points to a null sender?  Most null sender emails I get are spam and was wondering if I could assign a point value to null sender?   Bennie  

[Declude.JunkMail] Integrity Checker

2003-10-10 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi;   I wonder if a test could be setup that checks for the integrity of the email.  For example:   === X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [67.121.210.25]X-Declude-Spoolname: D17aa0bbd0062ac07.SMDX-Note: This E-mail was scanned & filtered by Declude [1.76i5] for SPAM & virus.X-Weight: 13X