Someone pointed out a false positive related to not being able to detect
a forwarded message on one of the filters, and as a result, I have added
a couple of likes to each filter with Forward detection in the
counterbalancing measures in order to prevent this from happening again.
The existing
Thanks Scott, you nailed it (of course). Phew! Now to go and make lots
of money :)
Matt
R. Scott Perry wrote:
I'm hoping that maybe someone can lend me a little assistance here.
I've set up my first MX gateway client, but am having problems with
IMail rejecting the address as non local.
I'm hoping that maybe someone can lend me a little assistance here. I've
set up my first MX gateway client, but am having problems with IMail
rejecting the address as non local. Here's the log file entry:
SMTPD (0013015C) [200.105.34.86] ERR mx1.mailpure.com invalid user
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for the IMail question being posted here, but I don't participate
on any other groups that might know how to handle this.
I'm hoping that maybe someone can lend me a little assistance here.
I've set up my first MX gateway client, but am having problems with
IMail rejecting the address a
I'm getting application errors from Declude.
That should rarely ever happen (Declude has built-in exception handling for
almost all its code).
Reporting queued error: faulting application declude.exe fault address
0xd3d4.
Unfortunately, Microsoft isn't providing enough information to solve
Hi Scott,
I'm getting application errors from Declude. Running W2K3 Web
edition, Imail 8.03 with F-Prot & AVG. Dual 1.3Ghz processors, 2G Ram,
U160 controllers & 10K RPM SCSI Seagate Cheatahs.
This is from the Application
Event Log:
Event Type: Information
Event Source: Application Erro
hmm.. I was under the impression that was per-user. So I would stick
these in the root $default$? :
REDIRECT domain.com c:\blah\template-1.cfg
REDIRECT domain2.com c:\blah\template-1.cfg
It should actually be:
REDIRECT @domain.com c:\blah\template-1.cfg
REDIRECT @domain2.com c:\blah\templat
hmm.. I was under the impression that was per-user. So I would stick these
in the root $default$? :
REDIRECT domain.com c:\blah\template-1.cfg
REDIRECT domain2.com c:\blah\template-1.cfg
Jonathan
At 12:43 PM 10/31/2003, you wrote:
We've got several folders for custom $default$ files (for the
We've got several folders for custom $default$ files (for the per-domain
configs). However, many of them are in groups. (ie: these 15 domains all
have this setting). Copying the files or creating a batch for each group
is tolerable, but it seems there should be a cleaner way. Has anyone tried
We've got several folders for custom $default$ files (for the per-domain
configs). However, many of them are in groups. (ie: these 15 domains all
have this setting). Copying the files or creating a batch for each group
is tolerable, but it seems there should be a cleaner way. Has anyone tried
Title: Message
Hi
I have honeytraps
set up so that I can share the wonderful spam we get with one of our
vendors. It was set up prior to getting junkmail pro. Problem is, if
the spam is addressed to both a honeytrap address AND a real address, my
configuration means that the real address
Hello Kris,
the anti-AntiGibberish test is to help make sure that you don't trap legit
messages. it is important to have filters that remove weights as well as add to
them.
ken.
Friday, October 31, 2003, 9:36:56 AM, you wrote:
KM> I am currently using the Gibberishsub and Gibberish filters. I
I am currently using the Gibberishsub and Gibberish filters. I am a little
confused, am I supposed to apply the same weight to each test? For instance
Gibberish 7
AntiGibberish -7
Will this not cancel the test out completely? Or am I supposed to weight
them Different?
Thanks,
Kris McElroy
>> I don't see the reasoning behind sending SPAMCOP thousands of e-mails per
day that are already stopped by your system. <<
Presence in SPAMCOP is temporary. To REMAIN listed, you need to keep
submitting SPAM so that the senders keep getting listed.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Softwa
We run 2 mx records 1 for mail.customer.com and 1 for customer.com with
different weights 19 and 20.
The weights are not important except they should not be the the same.
Hope this helps
Steve
Markus Gufler wrote:
Last days we can see a lot of SMTP_DELIV_FAILED in our logfiles
Looks like there
Is there a way to limit how many Delude Processes are running at the Same
time?
Yes -- if you go to http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19980302-ES01.htm it
explains how to set up IMail to limit the number of processes used for mail
delivery.
However, this should rarely be necessary.
Is there a way to limit how many Delude Processes are
running at the Same time?
Thank You.
Kerry Gillis
McPherson Internet Services
McPherson Kansas
Last days we can see a lot of SMTP_DELIV_FAILED in our logfiles
Looks like there are out many mailservers using a spamfilter solution that
blocks all incoming smtp traffic if the sender domain cannot be resolved.
They shouldn't -- it's a very, very bad thing to do. But there are so many
anti-sp
Last days we can see a lot of SMTP_DELIV_FAILED in our logfiles
Looks like there are out many mailservers using a spamfilter solution that
blocks all incoming smtp traffic if the sender domain cannot be resolved.
So we've found out that one of our domains has a missing dns entry. Ok
resolved.
B
19 matches
Mail list logo
