Re[6]: [Declude.JunkMail] [BUMP] Files locked but not process ed ed

2004-01-02 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Andrew, > FWIW, I've been running v8.05 since it came out; I was getting at > least one spam per day that was not getting Decluded and thus made > it to my own Inbox, and today I received my first non-Decluded spam. > Not scientific, but it's another data point. Thanks for the input, wh

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Nigerian scam...

2004-01-02 Thread Dave Doherty
Thanks for a great effort Kami.   -Dave - Original Message - From: Kami Razvan To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 6:10 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Nigerian scam... http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/florida/orl-asecnigerian23122

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Nigerian scam...

2004-01-02 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi, Fritz- I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw it, but Kami's total score if a message hits every line in the filter is 4373. Your score is not unrealistic. -Dave - Original Message - From: "Fritz Squib" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AUTOWHITELIST issue

2004-01-02 Thread Matthew Bramble
Glenn \\ WCNet wrote: Yes, that happened to me. I had entered my address in the WebMail addy book for one of my accounts (don't recall why), and I started getting spam that showed as WHITELISTED. It wasn't obvious why at first because I wasn't the primary "To" recipient on the spam, but I finall

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist From

2004-01-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
The log file will normally show the tests that the E-mail failed, even if it is whitelisted. Does this hold true with PREWHITELIST ON? I thought PREWHITELISTING bypassed any further Decude processing and therefore logging. No (for E-mail that is whitelisted in one of the ways that support prew

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist From

2004-01-02 Thread Burzin Sumariwalla
At 02:16 PM 1/2/2004, you wrote: The log file will normally show the tests that the E-mail failed, even if it is whitelisted. -Scott Does this hold true with PREWHITELIST ON? I thought PREWHITELISTING bypassed any further Decude processing a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrade issue from 1.65 to 1.75

2004-01-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
I just upgraded from Junkmail 1.65 to 1.75 and I am now getting this error message: 01/02/2004 14:09:45 Qcff469fd01389792 WARNING: Unknown filter type . I have looked over all my filters and everything seems to be correct. I there a way to find out which test/filter is causing this? I tried debug

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AUTOWHITELIST issue

2004-01-02 Thread Matthew Bramble
R. Scott Perry wrote: I'll see if we can do this. It may get a bit tricky with the various combinations of user aliases, host aliases, and forwarding, but we could probably get it to work in most cases. I'll bet that you could fix 95% or more of the potential issue with just the real account b

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AUTOWHITELIST issue

2004-01-02 Thread Glenn \\\\ WCNet
Yes, that happened to me. I had entered my address in the WebMail addy book for one of my accounts (don't recall why), and I started getting spam that showed as WHITELISTED. It wasn't obvious why at first because I wasn't the primary "To" recipient on the spam, but I finally figured it out. G.Z.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AUTOWHITELIST issue

2004-01-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
I just noticed that one of my users has listed his own address in his Web address book, and I'm thinking this could become an occasional circumstance with unintended consequences. Since I turned AUTOWHITELIST ON, this means that anything with a MAILFROM that forges his personal address will e

[Declude.JunkMail] Upgrade issue from 1.65 to 1.75

2004-01-02 Thread Adam Hobach
Hello, I just upgraded from Junkmail 1.65 to 1.75 and I am now getting this error message: 01/02/2004 14:09:45 Qcff469fd01389792 WARNING: Unknown filter type . I have looked over all my filters and everything seems to be correct. I there a way to find out which test/filter is causing this? I tri

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist From

2004-01-02 Thread Burzin Sumariwalla
Sorry, I should have said, the Declude log shows the message was processed against the external tests and CATCHALLMAILS. The message failed the external test. The external test is Sniffer. Burzin At 01:50 PM 1/2/2004, you wrote: CATCHALLMAILS does just exactly that. What is the external test

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist From

2004-01-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
I'm using the line WHITELIST FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, the message fails an external test. The Declude log shows the message failed the external tests and CATCHALLMAILS. The WHITELIST FROM address matches the From and X-Declude-Sender headers of the message. The log file will normally

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] In case you wonder..

2004-01-02 Thread Matt Robertson
This one has been around for quite awhile as well. http://www.hiveware.com/enkoder_form.php Cheers, -- --- Matt Robertson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com --- -- --- [This E-mail w

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist From

2004-01-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
CATCHALLMAILS does just exactly that. What is the external test? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Burzin Sumariwalla > Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 11:4

[Declude.JunkMail] AUTOWHITELIST issue

2004-01-02 Thread Matthew Bramble
Scott, I just noticed that one of my users has listed his own address in his Web address book, and I'm thinking this could become an occasional circumstance with unintended consequences. Since I turned AUTOWHITELIST ON, this means that anything with a MAILFROM that forges his personal address

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist From

2004-01-02 Thread Burzin Sumariwalla
Hello, I'm using the line WHITELIST FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, the message fails an external test. The Declude log shows the message failed the external tests and CATCHALLMAILS. The WHITELIST FROM address matches the From and X-Declude-Sender headers of the message. Any ideas? Thanks,

[Declude.JunkMail] In case you wonder..

2004-01-02 Thread Kami Razvan
http://www.wbwip.com/wbw/emailencoder.html   By accident I came across this..   Regards, Kami

[Declude.JunkMail] Mailer type

2004-01-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Has any one seen this in the header of legit? X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.411 (Entity 5.404) John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.

[Declude.JunkMail] Word Of Mouth

2004-01-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
This must be a scam to get people to sign up. Someone has just begun to research your background via our website. This email has been automatically sent to you so as to make you aware that your background is being looked into. The popularity of our website is currently growing at a very rapid ra

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] CONSECUTIVECHAR test!

2004-01-02 Thread Matthew Bramble
BADCOUNTRYNOREVDNS would have stopped this. http://www.mailpure.com/software/decludefilters/badcountrynorevdns/BadCountryNoREVDNS_v1-0-0.zip This was sent from an IP block where at least the entire class C belongs to spammers that host in China. Even before I added this filter, over 99% of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] RBL - which DNS Server

2004-01-02 Thread Andy Schmidt
Well, I set it up - sent email, didn't get any reaction - so I don't know if we are contributing. Generally, their "Open Relay" list is tiny and the proxy list is only "okay" (as far as hosts listed): NJABLDUL..2304.07% NJABLPROXIES..860...15.23% NJABLRELAYS...

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Another scam

2004-01-02 Thread Burzin Sumariwalla
See http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,114050,00.asp The December 24, 2003 article says: Tumbleweed and the Anti-Phishing Working Group estimate that more than 60 million e-mail scam messages have been sent in the last two weeks and seek to take advantage of confusion and increased onli

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] CONSECUTIVECHAR test!

2004-01-02 Thread Matthew Bramble
GIBBERISHSUB will catch maybe 80% of this stuff with just 25 or so two character combinations. Some day I may add in some more strings slowly, but Declude's custom filtering environment wasn't designed for this type of thing. Scott could build in functionality for counting characters, but it's

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] RBL - which DNS Server

2004-01-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Any one using this yet, and is it helping? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt > Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 10:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] CONSECUTIVECHAR test!

2004-01-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> E.N.L.A^R.G.E > > A derivative of the COMMENTS test for the subject. The only issue here > is that this stuff is otherwise easy to target with a bunch of other > filters and therefore it almost never avoids deletion on my system. I'm > watching this one though because it could become much worse

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Another scam

2004-01-02 Thread Matthew Bramble
Care to share the headers? BTW, I was wrong about the Zap The Dingbat thing, he hid the address bar and used HTML to make a fake address bar. It was all done in PHP and very nicely coded. Maybe there aren't enough real jobs out there for Web designers :) Matt John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] CONSECUTIVECHAR test!

2004-01-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Examples: UtahNlawydycn daysOiwswvcm HoustonGruqrb 1iving?Bnx lfrmztzlvudgxulzhlc ehrcbaarornrmnfpubke Hereistheinfoyou usefu1Nnputywatn None were caught by GIBBERISHSUB. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] CONSECUTIVECHAR test!

2004-01-02 Thread Matthew Bramble
It also won't catch things like: "Your Amazon.com order has shipped (#101-4385494-1223513)" or "ORDER NO.B1093613-RFGDEF-01 HAS BEEN SHIPPED OUT" The last thing that I want to do is FP on ecommerce things. There's some of this stuff with all consonants as well, in very long strings. I'm not

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another scam

2004-01-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
FYI, I did add this for it: HEADERS 15 CONTAINScitibanksecure John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble > Sent: Friday, January 02, 20

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] CONSECUTIVECHAR test!

2004-01-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
GIBBERSHSUB would not catch things like BestProductEver and ImportantPleaseReadNow and so forth. I have seen a number of spam where the words are run together without spaces to by pass filters. Being about to count consecutive characters and add a weight of say nor more that 5 would help. John To

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Another scam

2004-01-02 Thread Matthew Bramble
The site's down now. The hosting provider said it was probably signed up with a stolen credit card. He had it down within just a minute of me sending the message. Good deed done for the day :) Matt Matthew Bramble wrote: The payload on this goes to a site that pops up a window using Zap T

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Another scam

2004-01-02 Thread Matthew Bramble
The payload on this goes to a site that pops up a window using Zap The Ding Bat URL obfuscation to make the URL look like it is the real Citibank site. Very dangerous and because it's being redirected on that site, you can't catch the technique in the E-mail. I contacted the hosting provider a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] CONSECUTIVECHAR test!

2004-01-02 Thread Matthew Bramble
John, This would FP on messages that include ID's in the subject such as receipts, and also base64 encoded subjects, some of which are perfectly valid and Declude doesn't decode subjects at this time. I also tend to see receipts with more characters than I tend to see in spam that appends gib

[Declude.JunkMail] Another scam

2004-01-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
I wonder how many people will actually fall for this: --=_579b51922d72e436946615fa16088dbb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --=_579b51922d72e436946615fa16088dbb Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] CONSECUTIVECHAR test!

2004-01-02 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Test suggestion. > > This would be like SUBJECTSPACES, instead would count > consecutive characters other than spaces in the subject line. > > CONSECUTIVECHAR consecutivechar 20 x 5 0 Also possibly CONSECUTIVECON

[Declude.JunkMail] CONSECUTIVECHAR test!

2004-01-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Test suggestion. This would be like SUBJECTSPACES, instead would count consecutive characters other than spaces in the subject line. CONSECUTIVECHAR consecutivechar 20 x 5 0 John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You --- [This E-mail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Could not open installed.bin

2004-01-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
The installed.bin file is located in the *\Imail\Declude folder. If it is there, delete it, then double click on declude.exe in the *\Imail folder. Also, go to a command prompt and change to the Imail directory and type in declude -diag and make sure it is reporting correctly. John Tolmachoff Engi

[Declude.JunkMail] Could not open installed.bin

2004-01-02 Thread Robert
Hello, I seem to get this on every message. 01/02/2004 10:46:11 Q92430dd100c4a4da Could not open installed.bin 01/02/2004 10:46:11 Q923c139a01408972 Could not open installed.bin Could anybody shed some light? Thanks Robert --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://