RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Any sort of Challenge Response tool for Declude/Imail??

2004-02-02 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi George, >> is there any type of Challenge Response tools available for Imail that you are aware of << Unfortunately - not. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just se

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Any sort of Challenge Response tool for Declude/Imail??

2004-02-02 Thread Matt
Challenge/Response has been covered at length twice recently on this list, and the almost universal informed opinion is that the shortcomings ruin it's applicability to a general E-mail environment. Aside from that, there is no doubt that you could be better handling the bounce messages as well

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Any sort of Challenge Response tool for Declude/Imail??

2004-02-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Search the archives for Challenge Response. It was just discussed last week. (Maybe on the virus list.) Do not use it! John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of I

[Declude.JunkMail] Any sort of Challenge Response tool for Declude/Imail??

2004-02-02 Thread ITG Lists
Hi all, We got hammered today with "failed delivery" messages, as most of our email addresses were set as reply-to in a ton of spam :-( On top of that I have clients complaining about the continuing flood of ads dealing with those pills for men (name omitted for obvious reasons). It sure seems l

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation

2004-02-02 Thread Dave Doherty
I use BulkRegister.com. Nice interface, easy login, $12/year. -Dave - Original Message - From: "Todd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 1:05 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation > Anyone using a registrar that t

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] False spam - spam database

2004-02-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
If I whitelisted it, will the logs still show which tests it failed? Yes. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers. Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver vulnerability dete

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] False spam - spam database

2004-02-02 Thread Bridges, Samantha
If I whitelisted it, will the logs still show which tests it failed? -Original Message- From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 2:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] False spam - spam database >Seems that mail from delphi.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] False spam - spam database

2004-02-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
Seems that mail from delphi.com is not being delivered. I Whitelisted @delphi.com and received the message fine. Therefore, I assume that Declude is blocking it. I looked the address up on www.dnsstuff.com and saw that it was listed under 3 spam databases. That means that their IP is listed in

[Declude.JunkMail] False spam - spam database

2004-02-02 Thread Bridges, Samantha
Hello. Seems that mail from delphi.com is not being delivered. I Whitelisted @delphi.com and received the message fine. Therefore, I assume that Declude is blocking it. I looked the address up on www.dnsstuff.com and saw that it was listed under 3 spam databases. CSMA CSMA-SBL INTRUDERS I s

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Client receiving E-mail to non-MX address

2004-02-02 Thread Matt
That's not possible under the client's current setup.  I can remove the mail.domain.tld address in this case, however for clients that have SMTP AUTH and remote users, a change of this sort, or a change of the sub-domain would cause them to have to change their mail client configurations, and I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Client receiving E-mail to non-MX address

2004-02-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
Here's their SOA query results: nameserver = NS85.WORLDNIC.com. mailaddress = namehost.WORLDNIC.com. serial = 2004013002, refresh = 10800, retry = 3600, expire = 604800, minimum = 7200. I'm thinking that what this says is that it will take up to 7 days for the records to expire. Actu

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Client receiving E-mail to non-MX address

2004-02-02 Thread Matt
Here's their SOA query results: nameserver = NS85.WORLDNIC.com. mailaddress = namehost.WORLDNIC.com. serial = 2004013002, refresh = 10800, retry = 3600, expire = 604800, minimum = 7200. I'm thinking that what this says is that it will take up to 7 days for the records to expire. It a

[Declude.JunkMail] Truth in advertising?

2004-02-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Fortunately, the site is not reachable. Hello, Thank you for registration on our board - http://www.carderportal.o= rg Welcome to our underground Site! http://www.carderportal.org In our site you will find: Spam Hosting - from 20$ per

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Client receiving E-mail to non-MX address

2004-02-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have a client that we switched over to our service last Thursday. The mail server is located at mail.domain.tld (according to the A record), but their MX records on their authoritative DNS server both point to us. Unfortunately, they are still receiving E-mail directed at their server inst

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Client receiving E-mail to non-MX address

2004-02-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
One thing they could do, is restrict incoming e-mail by IP address to only your server IP. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt > Sent: Monday, February 0

[Declude.JunkMail] Client receiving E-mail to non-MX address

2004-02-02 Thread Matt
I have a client that we switched over to our service last Thursday. The mail server is located at mail.domain.tld (according to the A record), but their MX records on their authoritative DNS server both point to us. Unfortunately, they are still receiving E-mail directed at their server inste

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about MAILBOX action.

2004-02-02 Thread Charles Frolick
I don't use the MAILBOX action at all, I write a filterable header and use Imail filters to sort mail. Means it will work even on forwarded accounts to other servers or in clients with header filtering capabilities. Also, since I classify spam rank, you can take different actions based on rank, de

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Word of Mouth connection?

2004-02-02 Thread Timm Jasper
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote: I consider it spam! I have had a couple of conversations with them. IMHO, the so called notices that some one is looking into you is nothing more than a marketing attempt to get you to sign up and pay money. There is absolutely no way you can find out if it is true

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] virus tester

2004-02-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
The virus tester is asking for a log on at the web site. Is there one or is this a mistake? If there is one how do we get it? Our web hosting company accidentally set up all PHP files to require a password (we don't even know the password!). We expect that it should be fixed shortly.

[Declude.JunkMail] virus tester

2004-02-02 Thread Terry Fritts
The virus tester is asking for a log on at the web site. Is there one or is this a mistake? If there is one how do we get it? Terry Fritts --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubs

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Strange message not marked as SPAM:

2004-02-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
Hmmm...Where does the problem lie, Declude or IMail? Has it been fixed in post-1.75 Declude or post-8.01 IMail? These account for about half of the 6% of spam that slips through my current weighting. The rest I don't currently have tests for, but fixing this alone would improve my results to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Word of Mouth connection?

2004-02-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
I consider it spam! I have had a couple of conversations with them. IMHO, the so called notices that some one is looking into you is nothing more than a marketing attempt to get you to sign up and pay money. There is absolutely no way you can find out if it is true that some one is looking you u