RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bounce not an action??

2004-03-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
After reading archives for the past two hours, I still do not understand why this is happening. I completely removed BOUNCE from $default$.junkmail and global.cfg. I changed it to delete. Great! As is evidenced by the lines below, WEIGHT40 is set to LOG and WEIGHT50=IGNORE. But in my cfg

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bounce not an action??

2004-03-05 Thread Jim Rooth
Title: Message After reading archives for the past two hours, I still do not understand why this is happening. I completely removed BOUNCE from $default$.junkmail and global.cfg. I changed it to delete. As is evidenced by the lines below, WEIGHT40 is set to LOG and WEIGHT50=IGNORE. But in

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bounce not an action??

2004-03-05 Thread Jim Rooth
I AGREE with you 100% Where besides the global.cfg and the $default$.junkmail could I have BOUNCE set up? I can't find it anywhere. Jim Rooth Clotron, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] 214.244.0979 If you can read this.thank a teacher If you are reading this in English, thank a veteran! -Original

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bounce not an action??

2004-03-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
I AGREE with you 100% Where besides the global.cfg and the $default$.junkmail could I have BOUNCE set up? I can't find it anywhere. You can use LOGLEVEL HIGH to see which config files Declude JunkMail is using. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bounce not an action??

2004-03-05 Thread Joe Raykiewicz
I think maybe you should ensure that there are no other config files anywhere hanging around. Search the folder for files inclding the text bounce and see what you come up with. Hope that helps. Joe - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bounce not an action??

2004-03-05 Thread Jim Rooth
Thanks Scott, found it hidden in a per user file! Jim Rooth Clotron, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] 214.244.0979 If you can read this.thank a teacher If you are reading this in English, thank a veteran! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bounce not an action??

2004-03-05 Thread Jim Rooth
One last thing...I have figured a way to keep the customer happy and still be bouncing everything. I have this particular client set up per domain. They are the only one out of 75 that are set that way. I have gone into their domain $default$.junkmail file and added WEIGHT40 ROUTETO [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bounce not an action??

2004-03-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have gone into their domain $default$.junkmail file and added WEIGHT40 ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain .com. I am of the opinion that this will send all mail with a weight of 40 or higher (to WEIGHT 60 which is set to delete) that is sent to their domain but will not send any other mail from

[Declude.JunkMail] Websense

2004-03-05 Thread Kevin Stanford
I installed Websense yesterday and since then I have been getting email stopped because it cannot find the MX record. Here is a sample: 03/04/2004 14:07:38 Q8c7c04700342f0a4 WARNING: DNS server 10.100.1.16 returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX or A for bmccapital.com. Websense is filtering

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bounce not an action??

2004-03-05 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Someone correct me if I am wrong with what you said no messages will be deleted they will all use the WEIGHT40 ROUTETO action. If you use the ROUTETO and the DELETE at t higher weight the ROUTETO once the email is routed it can not be delete To be confidant of which action will happen use

[Declude.JunkMail] black list based on the domain registrants email address?

2004-03-05 Thread Paul Fuhrmeister
I'll explain the issue and then ask the question. We are having trouble with a spammer who registers new domain names every day and spams our customers from a DSL line with a dynamic ip. They changes the text a bit each time, leaving us nothing to filter on except this, from (unix) whois lookups:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bounce not an action??

2004-03-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
with what you said no messages will be deleted they will all use the WEIGHT40 ROUTETO action. If you use the ROUTETO and the DELETE at t higher weight the ROUTETO once the email is routed it can not be delete Actually, what happens with WEIGHT40 ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED] and WEIGHT60 DELETE is

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Missing headers

2004-03-05 Thread Bill Landry
Scott, I sent you my global.cfg, $default$.junkmail, and a debug log snippet. Any updates on this issue where I have defined my tests with the WARN action and Declude is instead using the IGNORE action? Thanks, Bill - Original Message - From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] Deccon Error

2004-03-05 Thread Kevin Shimwell
Im getting this error but have no Idea how to fix it. Couldn't Creat MAP 1:5 kevin Kevin Shimwell Link Brokers Group, LLC ( Support ) 1600 Hwy 17 South North Myrtle Beach, SC 29582 Phone: 843-663-1004 Fax: 843-663-1007 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 24/7 Support

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] black list based on the domain registrants email address?

2004-03-05 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi Paul- Of course, as soon as you figure it out, she'll change her address... -Dave - Original Message - From: Paul Fuhrmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 11:53 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] black list based on the domain registrants email

[Declude.JunkMail] reports on sys0304.log

2004-03-05 Thread Administration
Hello, I was wondering if any one here had a tool for or knew a way to get statistics from the imail sys logs? I have the unix tools installed so run stats on the declude logs. but i can't get it to work on the sys log, i'm trying to get a count on the number of times that each IP shows up in the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Missing headers

2004-03-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, I sent you my global.cfg, $default$.junkmail, and a debug log snippet. Any updates on this issue where I have defined my tests with the WARN action and Declude is instead using the IGNORE action? We're working on it. We had another similar issue reported a month or so ago, added code to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Deccon Error

2004-03-05 Thread Kevin Shimwell
I downloaded it but still get the error. What next. kevin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 12:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Deccon Error Im getting this error but

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Deccon Error

2004-03-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
I downloaded it but still get the error. What next. What version of Declude are you running (\IMail\Declude -diag from a command prompt will show you)? It sounds like you may be running an older version -- I believe you won't see that message with recent versions of Declude JunkMail. The one

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Missing headers

2004-03-05 Thread bill.maillists
I've noticed the same thing. Is this caused by not having the test listed in the Outbound Test section of the GLOBAL file, for JM Pro? Bill -- Original Message -- From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Missing headers

2004-03-05 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Scott, I sent you my global.cfg, $default$.junkmail, and a debug log snippet. Any updates on this issue where I have defined my tests with the WARN action and Declude is instead using the IGNORE action? We're working on

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Missing headers

2004-03-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
I've noticed the same thing. Is this caused by not having the test listed in the Outbound Test section of the GLOBAL file, for JM Pro? Declude JunkMail will use the IGNORE action if either [1] the config file that is used for the recipient uses the IGNORE action, or [2] there is no action

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] black list based on the domain registrants email address?

2004-03-05 Thread Administration
Hello, I don't think this can be done with out alot of code, this would involve making a program to do whois looks by email address, which i don't think can be done, and even if it could be done, and would be very taxing and slow, as such would create a large back log on high traffic server. Ken