[Declude.JunkMail] Log feature request

2004-04-29 Thread Scott Fisher
For log level high, I'd like to see the failure line for fromfile test logged. Current log line: 04/28/2004 00:14:52 Q3dca01de026a2147 Msg failed BLACKLIST-DOMAIN (). Action=WARN. Desired log line; 04/28/2004 00:14:52 Q3dca01de026a2147 Msg failed BLACKLIST-DOMAIN (@bestdeals.com). Action=WARN.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Wildcards in sender blacklist

2004-04-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
Are wildcards supported in the sender blacklists? For example: @mail*.rapiddealsbyemail.com @mail*.emailcourrier.com @relay*.reunion.com @*xxx* No, that is not possible. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailse

[Declude.JunkMail] Wildcards in sender blacklist

2004-04-29 Thread Todd Holt
I found some discussions of this last year and I wanted to see if anything had changed: Are wildcards supported in the sender blacklists? For example: @mail*.rapiddealsbyemail.com @mail*.emailcourrier.com @relay*.reunion.com @*xxx* Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.434

[Declude.JunkMail] Microsoft CRM and e-mail

2004-04-29 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Any one dealing with users or clients or recipients that may be using Microsoft CRM, take note: E-mail messages sent from/via/through Microsoft CRM will fail SUBJECTSPACES and LONGSUBJECT type tests. This is because CRM automatically adds tracking information to the subject line. Here is a respons

[Declude.JunkMail] Issue with Bounce EML File

2004-04-29 Thread Robert Forsyth
Setting up a 'bad users/stalker' filter (BOUNCEONLYIFYOUMUST) in Declude in which I have my Yahoo address in the external file as a test address. The bounced email (VIEWERABUSE.EML) looks like an 'unknown user' bounce with a copy to me, so the sender thinks the person is no longer here. In my boun

[Declude.JunkMail] New script and filter

2004-04-29 Thread Roger Eriksson
Hi, I have written a new command script that creates a filter which seems to be promising. The rationale behind this is two observations: most spam have several recipients and most spam is sent to invalid addresses. Our server rejects about 75% of all incoming messages for the latter reason. T

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Per-Domain Virus.CFG?

2004-04-29 Thread Jeff Maze - Hostmaster
Good point.. Thanks.. I'll forward that inform onto him.. Well, you can never tell with some of these people.. He probably uses Internet Explorer to first find the location of the file and then send it as a link.. Probably one of those types that knows enough about computers that could cause dam

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Per-Domain Virus.CFG?

2004-04-29 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Let me get this straight. You have a client that is distributing security updates in a non-security minded way, correct? Tell him to wise up and put the link in the body, not as an attachment. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per-Domain Virus.CFG?

2004-04-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
Was wondering if there was a way to have a per-domain virus.cfg. No -- the virus.cfg (like the global.cfg file for Declude JunkMail) only contains global settings. Is it possible to have only his domain allow this extension so he can distribute the file or the only way to change

[Declude.JunkMail] Per-Domain Virus.CFG?

2004-04-29 Thread Jeff Maze - Hostmaster
Hello, Was wondering if there was a way to have a per-domain virus.cfg. The reason I ask is that I have "BANEXT lnk" in the virus.cfg (which I recently added). Today a client responded saying he distributes McAfee Enterprise anti-virus updates via email using a shortcut (*.lnk) as the atta

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitlisted 0.0.0.0 ??

2004-04-29 Thread R. Lee Heath
Reply to: R. Scott Perry Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitlisted 0.0.0.0 ?? on Thursday 6:32:14 AM Sorry, no logs. I do have the message complete with header and will send it to you privately. This is the only one I have seen. -- Roger Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.rleeheath.com - Copy of Ori

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitlisted 0.0.0.0 ??

2004-04-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
M> Received: from À [66.63.168.171] by rleeheath.com M> (SMTPD32-8.10) id AE395E1A020E; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:28:57 -0500 M> X-RBL-Warning: RDNS-ROUTE: 0.0.0.0 - (Private IP) - Reverse DNS 0.0.0.0 ??? automatic whitelisted? Wondering how this spam was autowhitelisted and went right through? Using