James,
If you are using the latest beta (1.79), you can use the filters in the
hidden beta section of my site:
http://www.mailpure.com/software/decludefilters/beta/
These make use of several new enhancements that can cut the processor
utilization of these filters by probably 90% (primarily fr
R. Scott Perry wrote:
I am using F-Prot for virus scanning. Everytime I've tried using the
fpcmd.exe scanner it fails to detect anything. I'll try this again.
My current scanfile line is as follows:
SCANFILED:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\F-Prot.exe /TYPE /SILENT /NOMEM
/ARCHIVE /NOFLOPPY /N
I am using F-Prot for virus scanning. Everytime I've tried using the
fpcmd.exe scanner it fails to detect anything. I'll try this again. My
current scanfile line is as follows:
SCANFILED:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\F-Prot.exe /TYPE /SILENT /NOMEM
/ARCHIVE /NOFLOPPY /NOBOOT /DUMB /REPORT=re
R. Scott Perry wrote:
Over the last week or so we have been getting terrible performance,
mostly noticed through SMTP (either not accepting connections on port
25 or really slow response). I have not been able to find any errors
reported in Imail or Declude. Watching Task Manager shows the CP
Declude JM logs will help here.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Nelson
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 2:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [De
Over the last week or so we have been getting terrible performance, mostly
noticed through SMTP (either not accepting connections on port 25 or
really slow response). I have not been able to find any errors reported
in Imail or Declude. Watching Task Manager shows the CPU maxed at 100%
almos
Over the last week or so we have been getting terrible performance,
mostly noticed through SMTP (either not accepting connections on port 25
or really slow response). I have not been able to find any errors
reported in Imail or Declude. Watching Task Manager shows the CPU maxed
at 100% almost
Thanks all :)
Matt
Markus Gufler wrote:
I recall someone indicating that this was possible. By
default, Declude seems to use the per-domain config that is
the final destination on the server instead of the RCPT To
address (if forwarded to a different domain). I believe
there i
> I recall someone indicating that this was possible. By
> default, Declude seems to use the per-domain config that is
> the final destination on the server instead of the RCPT To
> address (if forwarded to a different domain). I believe
> there is a switch to turn this resolution off, but i
I recall someone indicating that this was possible. By default, Declude
seems to use the per-domain config that is the final destination on the
server instead of the RCPT To address (if forwarded to a different
domain). I believe there is a switch to turn this resolution off, but
it's difficu
SWITCHRECIP ON
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 5:14 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Using the RCPT To domain instead of what's
resolved to.
I recall someone indicating that this was possible. By default,
I recall someone indicating that this was possible. By default, Declude
seems to use the per-domain config that is the final destination on the
server instead of the RCPT To address (if forwarded to a different
domain). I believe there is a switch to turn this resolution off, but
it's diffic
Can we make imail/junkmail reject any ougoing message where From or ReturnTo
are not valid local addresses ?
Not easily. You could probably do it with filters, if you listed all local
E-mail addresses, but it could not be done manually.
-Scott
Can we make imail/junkmail reject any ougoing message where From or ReturnTo
are not valid local addresses ?
TIA
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail t
Can you give any idea when the next full release will be out and the
doccumentation updated?
Unfortunately, I do not have an answer for that yet.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declu
Scott,
Can you give any idea when the next full release will be out and the
doccumentation updated? I'm primarly interested in the doccumentation of the
new features.
Searching the mail archive is ok but relying on mail-archive for information
can be difficult when they are upgrading or behind.
Caller ID, Sender Policy Framework to be united.
http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/05/25/HNmsantispamplanmerge_1.html
Fritz
Frederick P. Squib, Jr.
Network Operations/Mail Administrator
Citizens Telephone Company of Kecksburg
http://www.wpa.net
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail
/
Starting in the 1.78 versions:
New tests "dow" and "hour", to allow hour and day-of-week detection. IE "HOUR hour 9
16 0 0" for local 9AM->4:59PM. DOW dow 1 5 0 0 for Monday through Friday.
Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/25/04 11:56AM >>>
Can someone
Can someone tell me what DOW is?
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "John Olden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:09 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DOW test
> Maybe someone can answer this for me. Looking at my daily
Maybe someone can answer this for me. Looking at my daily WamLog stats I
see that my DOW test is averaging about 90-95% on message failure.
DOW2366 912443 86
Message Count25902836
Shouldn't this be 100%? I have the following definition?
DOWdow15-1010
20 matches
Mail list logo
