Is this the correct configruation line for doing this?
SURBLS-RHSBL rhsbl %MAILFROM%.sc.surbl.org 127.0.0.2 5 0
Markus
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send
Hmmm, that could possibly render some decent results if spammers use the
same domain in the "MAIL FROM:" address in the SMTP envelope as they us in
the URI listed in the body of the message. How are the results stacking up
against your other RHSBL tests?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "
> How does using ldap2alias change my backup mail structure?
On the backup, you create actual IMail virtual hosts in the form
storeforward.example.com, with example.com as a host alias. You also
ensure that the mailbox server can accept mail to, say,
mailbox.example.com in
I know it is not the intended use of the SURBL
list, but is anyone else using the SURBL test as a RHSBL test?
I just figured if the URL is used for spam, do I
really want to be receiving e-mail from that domain?
So far it has been > 99.5%
effective.
I'm just curious to see if anyone else ha
I am still having a problem on the proper configuration. I do have
ldap2alias and alias2ldap scripts working. I am just not quite sure how to
setup IMail on the backup servers.
Currently I have 1 mailbox server with 10 domains and 3 backup servers, each
on a different ISP.
So if I have the f
Hello R.,
Monday, November 22, 2004, 3:53:49 PM, you wrote:
>>Something's up with Declude. About 9 this morning I started getting
>>thses in my Declude log files but not persistent. I've got good sniffer
>>log files before, during and after this.
>>
>>11/22/2004 14:15:31 Q3acf00d70024690f Error
Something's up with Declude. About 9 this morning I started getting
thses in my Declude log files but not persistent. I've got good sniffer
log files before, during and after this.
11/22/2004 14:15:31 Q3acf00d70024690f Error 2 starting external program
[P:\Progra~1\Snifferlicenseidhere.exe authst
Something's up with Declude. About 9 this morning I started getting
thses in my Declude log files but not persistent. I've got good sniffer
log files before, during and after this.
11/22/2004 14:15:31 Q3acf00d70024690f Error 2 starting external program
[P:\Progra~1\Snifferlicenseidhere.exe authst
Sounds more like brute force technology.
Michael Jaworski
Puget Sound Network, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy Hilton
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 10:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] They should try
So, the benefit of being a higher-up, muckity-muck at Microsoft is not
having the best software, but rather the duckets to hire an entire dept. of
folks to clean up your email for you. I wish I could afford "Microsoft's
Anti-spam Technology"
Gee, must be nice.
-Original Message-
From: [
This is a prime example of why Bill Gates and our legislators will not work
harder on eliminating spam. They have people that handle their spam for
them. They don't realize how big a pain in the posterior it really is.
They probably had to actually answer the calls at home from the
telemarketers an
I agree, and they'll probably market that as an Exchange addon in a year or
two.
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] They should try declude :)
> That was my first thou
I have a filter posted on my Declude site for 419's and another for
lottery's.
They use the MINWEIGHTTOFAIL option requiring 4 lines to match to get
credit.
It is very CPU intensive...
It also uses several other tests as indicators (upper case subject),
mailfrom free or web mail, so it uses:
an ip
That was my first thought as well, but I realized it was biased. Having a
"dedicated department" could mean both manual review, and developers
creating rules to eliminate spam. I can't imagine a software company not
doing some of that.
I think there are people on this list who have probably gott
I will be out of the office starting 11/20/2004 and will not return until
11/29/2004.
I will respond to your message when I return.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscrib
Create a custom body filter that contains a list of the unique phrases,
misspellings and names they use in the letters. Along with filters like
Matt's at mailpure.com will catch most if not all of them.
There is a website that has a lot of the phrases also, do a Google for 4_1_9
and N*i*g*e*r*i
I've been looking at the archives about the N*i*g*e*r*i*a*n letter filters
and saw a lot of discussion back in January, but couldn't tell what people
concluded would be the best filter for this. Does anyone have anything to
share? (Prefer a Declude only solution as I don't have SpamAssassin.)
Th
Well, the question is what are they using? And is it available to "Joe
User"?
Ah, they at least give a hint as to what they are using:
"But being one of the top people at the world's top software company has
its perks. Ballmer said only about 10 junk e-mails make it through to his
inbox each day
Well, the question is what are they using? And is it available to "Joe
User"?
Troy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Serge
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] They should try declude :)
19 matches
Mail list logo
