If you have the PRO version, you can set up per domain and per user
filtering, and configure no actions for that user. That way, scanning is
done properly, nothing is white listed, and everything to that user is
delivered. This is the way I do it for any one wanting all their messages,
even spam.
Markus,
I have found that my users miss about 99% of the false positives using
a system where I set up review accounts in Web-mail for each domain and
only capture less than 2% of their blocked volume for them to review.
Reprocessing and reporting the message is done with a single click
using
Bonno,
Unfortunately 'knowing' is rarely the result of first hand experience
in this case, at least without a good deal of focus and research over
time. Personally, I have found that E-mail coming from the the better
bulk-mail providers rarely breaks my rules. Generally if you have
heard of
Aside from EMERGENCYBYPASS there is another compromise with JunkMail
Pro:
1) Take out the WHITELIST TO statement
2) Add ALLRECIPS -100 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Assuming that you have a weighted system and no tests that have HOLD or
DELETE that this guy would want to see, this will
Chris Patterson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am having trouble with an issue where spam is getting by showing
> whitelisted in the header. Neither the domain or e-mail address that it
> is coming from is whitelisted in the global config, nor are they showing
> as Auth-user.
>
> However, one of the re
He likes his spam.
I am wide open to better ideas, other than teaching spammers how to be
better spammers.
Thanks,
Chris Patterson, CCNA
Network Engineer
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 6:09 PM
To: Declude.Ju
Very Nice,
Should I add anything to the default.junkmail file?
EMERGENCYBYPASS WARN ??
Thanks,
Chris Patterson, CCNA
Network Engineer
Rapid Systems
-Original Message-
From: Kami Razvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 5:57 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.
That is why whitelisting from or to an e-mail address is very touchy and
dangerous.
Why is anything for that user configured to be whitelisted?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL P
Chris:
We were having a similar issue- Scott suggested the following:
EMERGENCYBYPASS bypasswhitelist 40 2 0 0
So now if the weight passes 40 the whitelist will not work if 2 more people
are in the list.
You can adjust the settings per your environment.
Regards,
Kami
Hi all,
I am having trouble with an issue where spam is getting by showing
whitelisted in the header. Neither the domain or e-mail address that it
is coming from is whitelisted in the global config, nor are they showing
as Auth-user.
However, one of the recipients (local user) is Whitelisted; wh
I'm close to finish a reporting tool that will send out a
daily notification to the local recipient if new messages was hold on the
mailserver with a final weight slightly above the hold weight (up to now we
review this messages regulary and can find an average of one false positive each
day
Matt,
Although I agree with your reasoning, my problem
would then be how do I determine who belongs to what catagorie? Overhere I
see stuff getting caught which is definitely a newsletter of some sorts but I
don't know whether the user requested it or not. Nor whether the user might wan
WOW... Matt you are a genius..
I have looked at that filter for over a week and did not even think of the
tab.. YES there was a tab and that should explain it.
Now lets see if it works..
Thanks again for seeing what could not be seen..
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL P
That should work. Would you please include your Global.cfg lines for
the involved tests just to see if there is an oversight there.
I also noted that following the first TESTSFAILED entry, there is a tab
character following [SPF.FAIL]. If that tab exists within your filter
file, that would be
Hi;
I have one filter that is killing me and it just does not make sense for it
not to work.
Here is an example of a message that should have triggered it but it has
not.
Log file ===
12/20/2004 04:52:48 Qa0e1026302703444 NOT bypassing whitelisting of E-mail
with weight >=25 (34) a
This was the subject of a recent off-list discussion between myself and
Pete where there was a perception that my definition of spam was too
conservative or rather my definition of ham was too liberal. While I
readily admit that in practice, I do personally wish to block
many fewer things that
16 matches
Mail list logo