[Declude.JunkMail] UCEProtect Levels Return codes

2005-03-06 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Hi all, Darrell posted this in another thread UCEPROTECT-LAST dnsbl %IP4R%.dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net 127.0.0.2 6 0 UCEPROTECT-ALL ip4rdnsbl-1.uceprotect.net 127.0.0.2 2 0 I looked up web site and see that there are three levels of DNS lists. UCE-PFSM-1 for Level 1

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] UCEProtect Levels Return codes

2005-03-06 Thread Scott Fisher
Here's what the lists refer to: UCE-PFSM-1 for Level 1 = Single IPs (Defaultlist, very conservative) UCE-PFSM-2 for Level 2 = /24 Nets (stronger, but more effective) UCE-PFSM-3 for Level 3 = Virusspreaders (Warning, Lots of Smarthosts) I have found many IPs are listed on level 1 and level 2. For

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] UCEProtect Levels Return codes

2005-03-06 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Scott, I took a look at your stats and it seems to be a pretty good test. Any explanation why the Feb numbers are better than the Jan number L1 Jan - 1 FP in 268 Feb - 1 FP in 350 L2 Jan - 1 FP in 463 Feb - 1 FP in 970 Thanx Goran Jovanovic The LAN Shoppe -Original

[Declude.JunkMail] Held Kodak easyshare Headers

2005-03-06 Thread Marc Catuogno
This is one that actually got held, I don't know how it was sent or from what version: X-RBL-Warning: NEGATIVEHEADERS: Message failed NEGATIVEHEADERS test (line 14, weight -16) X-RBL-Warning: GARBAGE: Message failed GARBAGE test (line 38, weight 8) X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS1: Spamdomain

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist anywhere broken?

2005-03-06 Thread Marc Catuogno
I am running 1.82 and it seems that the whitelist isn't working. I don't want to post what the phase I am using is, but please be assured it is not working. The person sending the e-mail is using mail2web which is listed in SORBS, comes out of Canada and he is sending from my domain and not

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist anywhere broken?

2005-03-06 Thread Darin Cox
Kinda difficult to see where your problem is without the details...but I whitelisting work fine for me (though I do negative weighting on IPs from addresses and phrases instead of pure whitelisting). I'm waiting to see what CPHZ comes back with on the status of the problems with 2.x as

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist anywhere broken? DISREGARD

2005-03-06 Thread Marc Catuogno
Disregard - I'm an idiot. There was a trailing space in my global config file after my phrase. Apologies! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Catuogno Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 11:37 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist anywhere broken?

2005-03-06 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
If you practice putting the code words in the subject than you could be affected by the subject bug that was in the 1.8.x train. I believe domain that use domain keys like gmail will trigger this bug. Here is a link that first talks about it.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist anywhere broken?

2005-03-06 Thread Marc Catuogno
Thanks - I have told him to make sure he puts the code in the body of the e-mail under his signature. Marc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 11:53 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist anywhere broken? DISREGARD

2005-03-06 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Don't be too hard on your self. Just ask Scott. For a while, that was the root of most of my problems. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Catuogno Sent: