Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outlook Blank Folding Vulnerability

2005-08-17 Thread Matt
Just to clarify one thing.  While there are certainly issues with tagging legitimate E-mail with the Outlook CR Vulnerability, it doesn't have problems specifically with any popular E-mail clients including Thunderbird. The CR issues that were being tagged were likely the result of some sort o

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Outlook Blank Folding Vulnerability

2005-08-17 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Instant recap: Option 1) Let the virus scanner handle it, i.e. BANCRVIRUSESOFF Option 2) Upgrade to the current declude.exe and turn off the vulnerabilities as you find that they cause false positives, i.e. ALLOWVULNERABILITYOLBLANKFOLDING I chose Option 1) > -Original Message-

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Outlook Blank Folding Vulnerability

2005-08-17 Thread Aaron Clausen
-- Original Message -- From: "Colbeck, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:01:48 -0700 >A similar Outlook CR vulnerability was just discussed; check the >archives at: > >http://www.mail-archive.com/de

[Declude.JunkMail] IMAIL 8.2 support?

2005-08-17 Thread Marc Catuogno
Just wondering...if the Declude people are close to having this working yet? I'm being forced to jump up to at least 8.1 because IPswitch hasn't patched the IMAP vulnerability in the 8.05 that I am running. As long as I have to renew the SA I wouldn't mind running their most up to date software 8

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Outlook Blank Folding Vulnerability

2005-08-17 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
A similar Outlook CR vulnerability was just discussed; check the archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.virus%40declude.com/msg12356.html The same things would apply. The manual does list the gory details of what each vulnerability looks for, if you're interested. Andrew 8) P.s. Hell

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] VIRUS WARNING

2005-08-17 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
What Matt said... Plus, a customer viewing a hostile message will not infect your server; the hypothetical infected .jpg file would simply be served up as a file and would not be "executed" on the server, just on the client that views the image. On the other hand, one of your own technicians coul

[Declude.JunkMail] Outlook Blank Folding Vulnerability

2005-08-17 Thread A. Clausen
We have had a user get a plain-text message he sent out using Thunderbird 1.0.2 that got caught by this check in Declude Junkmail. Just wondering what precisely the error is and why Thunderbird-generated messages would be getting nailed with it. -- A. Clausen --- This E-mail came from the Declu

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] VIRUS WARNING

2005-08-17 Thread Matt
Kim, This most likely wasn't from an infected JPG.  This vulnerability is attacked through TCP ports: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS05-039 Vulnerability in Plug and Play Could Allow Remote Code Execution and Elevation of Privilege (899588) http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS0

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] VIRUS WARNING

2005-08-17 Thread Kim Premuda
To all... I posted this warning to the IMail list as well as the Declude list, and someone responded with the following link on August 16th: http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.esbot.a.html Symantec has more precise information regarding the worm than I can offer (

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] VIRUS WARNING

2005-08-17 Thread Markus Gufler
> Before rebooting my server I allways RENAME a dangerous file... ..maybe this will not work as long as the processes run and can't be stopped in the task manager. But if possible I too rename the original malware file and create a new one. (new empty textfile renamed to the previous filename)