[Declude.JunkMail] custom test setup for invURIBL

2005-10-06 Thread Bill Green dfn Systems
We are using IMail 8.12 / Declude 1.8 / Sniffer invURIBL. This combination has virtually eliminated Spam with very little False Positives. I am searching for ways to reduce the Processor penalty for invURIBL. Many of the latest updates have helped a little, but I have an idea that, if

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] custom test setup for invURIBL

2005-10-06 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Bill, There is a lot of things that can be done to lower the processor utilization. I would hate to speculate on what you can do since I am not familar with how you have your invURIBL configured. For example on my system I process 150K+ messages a day and looking at the timing information