Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Local Users Should be Whitelisted, right?

The next thing I would do is track back the message id to the imail logs and verify the user indeed did auth. If they did not auth they still would be able to send that message since it was destined to a local domain for that mail server. Darrell --- Ch

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

Thanks John! -Nick John T (Lists) wrote: A clarification on how to "reset" Hijack: For Declude versions 2.x and below, you need to end the Deccon.exe process. It is also best to do this with Imail SMTP and Queue Manager service stopped and no Declude.exe processes running to ensure that no pr

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

Thanks. -d - Original Message - From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:41 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question A clarification on how to "reset" Hijack: For Declude versions 2.x and below, you need to end the Deccon.exe proces

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.x returning blank Reverse DNS lookups sometimes

I thought it would be good to post this here since others might have some feedback that would help Declude determine the proper way to go on this. I have noted that in Declude 2.x, when an invalid reverse DNS lookup is found, such as 4.79.67.53 returning "alias = 53.0-127.67.79.4.in-addr.arpa

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Local Users Should be Whitelisted, right?

I have checked and they are sending their email through another mail server, which means they are NOT auth-ing for our server. So that means the message would go through the normal spam checks, right? Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: The next thing I would do is track back the message id

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Local Users Should be Whitelisted, right?

Kevin, Yes - your absolutly correct. They would have to directly connect to your server and have authentication enabled. Any sending via a remote server to your server will cause the message to be spam filtered. Darrell --