As far as I know there is no support for Mailbox Action. The equivalent is
Routeto for Smartermail, but still far from the nice functionality of the
Mailbox action. I hope some day we have Mailbox action available for
smartermail as well. Is an action I miss a lot.
Luis Arango
> -Original M
Gary,
That file is created manually when you want to override the defaults
that they have preconfigured. It makes sense to leave it alone until
you know of something specific that you wish to tweak that belongs in there.
Matt
Gary Steiner wrote:
I'm trying to understand the different De
I'm trying to understand the different Declude configuration files. I'm
running 3.x Pro with JM and EV under SmarterMail.
I've seen mention of the Declude.cfg file, but my configuration doesn't have
one. I see global.cfg, virus.cfg, confirm.cfg and hijack.cfg, as well as the
$default$.junkmai
Yea they have not fixed hta yet. If you are looking for the version do a
decludeproc.exe -v
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Kratka
> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 2:03 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subje
I have been attempting to run the diag for declude but every time I do I
received the following message
C:\IMail>decludeproc -diag
Invalid command line parameter:
-install Install Declude
-diagPrint diagnostics
What am I doing wrong.
Jeff Kratka
Declude 3.0.5.18
ALL - Fixed un-defined variables causing intermittent stop/start with the
decludeproc service.
JM - Fixed SmarterMail incoming email recipient domain aliases.
AV - Fixed un-defined variables, causing incorrect Virus Names.
David B
www.declude.com
---
This E-mail came from th
Mike,
If you are not already running the service you will need to run the
Declude_setup.exe to get the service installed etc, only thereafter can you
upgrade just the decludeproc.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M
Mike,
I am sure you know this, but you need to upgrade both declude.exe and
decludeproc.exe under 3.x.
Darrell
---
Incorporate SURBL and other URI blakclists into Declude. Try invURIBL and
see how effective intelligent URI filtering is -
http://www.i
David,
I only find a Delcude_Setup file that's 6MB. I was looking to just replace
the declude.exe file. I will go this route.
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 10:14 AM
To: Declude.
Because counterweighting let's you control how good you think a particular
source is. That way, if a really bad email comes in (high score), perhaps
from a spammer that is mimicking certain patterns to slip through filters,
then you still catch it. Whitelisting would have it go through no matter
I think (have no real proof) that CMDSPACE is not working right under 3.x?
I have been seeing a rash of servers which I would never expect to fail
CMDSPACE.
I have had CMDSPACE failures from Earthlink, Novell GroupWise, and Prodigy.
These are all legit messages (nothing forged to make it loo
I am missing the thought process.
Why is counterweighting by a large number so much better than whitelisting
if both achieve the same purpose?
Just asking,
Don
- Original Message -
From: "Travis Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 8:59 AM
Subject: Re:
Yes under the Declude Upgrade Section on the My Account Home Page
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Wiegers
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 10:54 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMai
Is there a link we can just get the declude exe file instead of the complete
install each time?
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 12:09 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.Vi
Exactly, counterweight works so much better. Whitelist at the last possible
option.
I counterweight everything and don't have a single whitelist entry.
Travis
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Decl
I sent an e-mail to a software vendor requesting answers to some questions.
That message was rejected based on a SPF Fail. Yes, I have SPF records setup
for my domains. So how did it fail, bad configuration on the recipient side.
By reviewing the heads and the rejection notice, I found that my serv
H David,
What you saw in the message below was all there is,
that was the entire message body after my test.
First line was the Received: line, last line was
the X-IMail-ThreadID: line.
As to how to reproduce it, do as I did, I describe
exactly what I did.
Groetjes,
Bonno Bloksma
---
17 matches
Mail list logo
