RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Not supporting null originator Problem

2005-12-19 Thread Chris Anton
Ok, here is the part that is driving me crazy...I have updated the "Null sender maximum tries" to 1, reset the SMTP service, and am still seeing rejections... but when I check the rfc ignorant listings, we are not listed there. Any thoughts? -Chris   -Original Message-From: Declude.J

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Not supporting null originator Problem

2005-12-19 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> Good point Sandy... I guess what I am saying is that I find it > strange that this email server is using a failure of ONE test to > reject mail. I have since corrected the RFC problem on my end. This is one of very few tests that I have always felt wholly confident in using for i

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Not supporting null originator Problem / CBL Problem

2005-12-19 Thread Dave Doherty
Chris- People rejecting mail on the basis of one test is a common problem. Twice now, I have had Imail boxes run afoul of the CBL because Imail responds to HELO queries with different domain names depending on the context. They see that as suspicious. Both times, they agreed to delist the ser

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Not supporting null originator Problem

2005-12-19 Thread Chris Anton
Good point Sandy... I guess what I am saying is that I find it strange that this email server is using a failure of ONE test to reject mail. I have since corrected the RFC problem on my end. -Chris -- Original Message -- From: Sanford Whiteman <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Not supporting null originator Problem

2005-12-19 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> 3) Should they really be blocking this email on such a flimsy test? Not flimsy at all, IMO. If you are unwilling to accept any non-delivery messages, I don't think you should expect anyone to take responsibility for your mail. --Sandy Sanford

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Not supporting null originator Problem

2005-12-19 Thread Bill Green dfn Systems
Hi Chris,   Refusing null senders actually breaks your email server according to thr RFCs. I know it's nice to be able to block all the false returns caused by forging viruses, but doing so in this manner also blocks legitimate server responces.   rfc-ignorant.org is actually a good source of

[Declude.JunkMail] Not supporting null originator Problem

2005-12-19 Thread Chris Anton
Hi all... having a problem with a user sending to albertus.edu.  Getting following error from their server:Unknown user: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   RCPT TO generated following response:554 Service unavailable; Sender address [EMAIL PROTECTED] blockedusing dsn.rfc-ignorant.org; Not supporting null o

[Declude.JunkMail] SBL Blocking FYI

2005-12-19 Thread Don Brown
Just as a FYI. SBL does block an entire /18, when only 1 or 2 /24's are responsible for sending Spam. What's worse is that if you have an assignment in that /18, but your IP's are totally clean (innocent bystander), they will Not remove the block for your Address Space. I know this for a fact, f