Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bcc failure - Mystery solved

2006-04-01 Thread Matt
Orin, My guess is that IMail replaced the first @ with a % and then Declude read that from the Q file and caused the PERCENT test to be failed. Declude, with only very specific and rare exceptions, processes the whole outgoing message as one and not every individual recipient. The PERCENT t

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bcc failure - Mystery solved

2006-04-01 Thread Orin Wells
Interesting. Buried in among the 87 email addresses was one with a typo that added an extra @ in a bad place. [EMAIL PROTECTED]@aol.com for example. It was 32nd on the list but apparently this was enough to trip up Declude to declare EVERY address to be sensed to include a Percent sign. Wha

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bcc failure

2006-04-01 Thread Orin Wells
owing up to find out I can't be sure. But the majority, > including one addressed to my own address, didn't. > > I have sent bcc mail out in the past with no problem. So why > now? Why with this list? Why does Declude think there are percent > signs in the outgoing email a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bcc failure

2006-04-01 Thread gbirdsall
ddresses? > > Here is the section of the log where some of the addresses are listed. > > 20060401 105222 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0CB400EE) [64.85.18.49] > connect 63.231.33.210 port 3179 > 20060401 105222 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0CB400EE) [63.231.33.210] EHLO > amd-orin.wel

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bcc failure

2006-04-01 Thread gbirdsall
addresses? > > Here is the section of the log where some of the addresses are listed. > > 20060401 105222 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0CB400EE) [64.85.18.49] > connect 63.231.33.210 port 3179 > 20060401 105222 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0CB400EE) [63.231.33.210] EHLO > amd-orin.wells.or

[Declude.JunkMail] Bcc failure

2006-04-01 Thread Orin Wells
oblem. So why now? Why with this list? Why does Declude think there are percent signs in the outgoing email addresses? Here is the section of the log where some of the addresses are listed. 20060401 105222 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0CB400EE) [64.85.18.49] connect 63.231.33.210 port 3179 20060

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Ben, Here is my understanding of Forwarders & Recursion If you have forwarders defined then any zone that your DNS is not authoritative for will look to the forwarders to resolve. If you have recursion on then your DNS server will call the root DNS servers and track down the authoritative DNS se

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread IMail Admin
I see; so it becomes non-authoritative on everything. Do you know what the difference is between the two recursion settings in MS DNS? There is one on the forwarders tab and one on the advanced tab. This is getting a little off-topic, but I appreciate the help anyway and the list looks quiet

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Don't configure any zones but allow recursion. John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IMail Admin > Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 9:45 AM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread IMail Admin
That's what I was thinking. How do you configure the cache-only? Thanks, Ben - Original Message - From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 1:59 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores? What I do is inst

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread John T \(Lists\)
What I do is install the MS DNS service on the Imail server, configure it for cache only allowing recursion, and point Imail and Declude to that. Make sure your firewall is configured to not allow the world to make DNS queries against it and you are set. John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye sha

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> There was some discussion about running a cache-only DNS server for > IMail/Declude. I didn't read most of the thread, and I never saw how > to make the DNS serve cache only, but I was thinking that if I had a > cache-only server that is only available to the mail server, then I > can leave o

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread IMail Admin
Hi Sandy, OK, I've got recursion back on, so now I get email again. I hate to think how many complaints I'm going to have in the morning. Fortunately, most of our clients aren't as aggressive as I am in deleting spam based on rating. I understand what you're saying, and I thank you for the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> That's when the JM scores got so high. I'm testing a different > config now: allow recursion on the Forwarders tab, but disable it on > the Advanced tab. I won't know if this works until I get some > messages. In the meanwhile, can anyone explain this to me? You _must_ allow recur

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread IMail Admin
OK, so now I've turned all recursion back on. As it is, I can't see any postings to the group because the SPAM ratings are all too high and they're being deleted. Let's hope things are back to normal. Ben - Original Message - From: "IMail Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Frida