Sanford Whiteman wrote:
In keeping with the increased CPU demands of such tests, the new
version of SPAMC32 will contain the ability to send the request to two
(maybe more than two in future) tiered SPAMD daemons. The second
daemon -- listening on a different port, or on a different
Does declude treat mail to an IMAIL alias any different than a true
account? I just noticed that the mails which appear to slip past some or
all testing are aliases.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May
We're getting an annoying amount of Viagra spam which currently contain a
link to one of these two sites:
lanseislan.com
cessofanne.com
Both domains resolve to 61.233.42.4 which is owned by CHINA RAILWAY
TELECOMMUNICATIONS CENTER
The source of the spam is coming from IPs in Italy and
Yes, and places like SBL do in fact list the IP's of spam sites for this
very purpose. Unfortunately there is no list dedicated to this
classification of IP's and mixing in spam source IP's with website IP's
is not universally accurate so it has to be scored lower and combo'd
with other
Dave,
One of the tests in invURIBL does exactly that. Resolves the IP address and
checks them against various RBL's. You can even configure additional RBL
checks for the IP against other RBL's.
This is how invURIBL is handled that domain on our server today. (Sorry for
any wrap).
invURIBL checks the body for URLs.
John T
eServices For You
Seek, and ye shall find!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 11:31 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject:
