Title: Message
Thank Mike,
The second I put that in, 3 were captured straight
away.
NICE!
Kindest RegardsCraig Edmonds123
Marbella InternetW: www.123marbella.comE : [EMAIL PROTECTED]Marbella
Guide Web PortalW: www.marbellaguide.comE: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Currently the only date format available is %DATE% which is
ddmmm I have added the request for different date formats to development
wishlist.
David
B
www.declude.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran JovanovicSent:
Friday, June 16, 2006 9:53 PMTo:
David,
This is not a development wish list item
it is a bug. Please have it put on the bug list for fixing.
Your own manual says that these variables
are available. BTW so does the 3.0.5 manual.
From the 4.0.8 manual
14. E-mail
Notifications
There are
also a number of
The manual indicates that these are for Email notifications
NOT for the spam hold folder which is what was being referred to.David
B
www.declude.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran JovanovicSent:
Monday, June 19, 2006 9:57 AMTo:
Sorry if this is waste of time, but I want
to be absolutely sure before I do anything to my server.
Is Declude 4.2 fully compatible with iMail
8.22?
Thanks,
Robert
---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL
Must be either
more broken spam or testing for a new spam storm.
John T
eServices For You
Seek, and ye shall
find!
---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".
Title: Message
Since
my original post we've caught about 1200 of them. Looks like some of the IPs are
showing up in Spamcop now.
Mike
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T
(Lists)Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 9:22 AMTo:
Declude 4.2 isfully compatible with iMail
8.22
David
B
www.declude.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert ShubertSent:
Monday, June 19, 2006 11:45 AMTo:
declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] compatibility
question
Sorry if this is
Robert
I"m
running 8.22 hf2 and Declude 4.1.
I
would not suggest going to 4.2 as I was getting some "leakage" of mail that
seemingly had not
been
scanned by declude. I could not find any record in either the declude, or the
virus log files.
I
found that the headers had no declude
Hi David [Barker],
Is there a list, or would you kindly post one of the known issues with
Declude? I'm still on 2x because of all the problems reported and what
I perceive as them not being resolved.
Thanks!
-Nick
John Doyle wrote:
Robert
I"m running 8.22 hf2 and Declude
Nick,
Here is a list of what the development team are currently working on.
Remember in each case these issues have been experienced by a relatively
small percentage of our customers and are NOT known issues, as one has to
take into account the environment and how Declude is used and configured.
Thanks David !
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
Nick,
Here is a list of what the development team are currently working on.
Remember in each case these issues have been experienced by a relatively
small percentage of our customers and are NOT known issues, as one has to
take into account the
Title: Message
I'd suggest that this would work better without false
positives. The headers are missing darn near everything, the date, the
message-id, the subject, and the from. Any one of these could be missing,
but Michael's script will punish with a weight of 30 if either of the two
I am also receiving some SPAM not scanned by Declude, I've found this old
(2004) mail that explains why (thanks to John T):
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg19342.html
I am using version 4.2, it seems that this old bug is present again.
If not, tell me what to do...
Let's not go accusing Declude of reintroducing a bug that was not really a
bug with Declude but more of a configuration issue that led to the problem.
Are you saying you are doing Store and Forward with Imail without having
Imail configured to only accept for valid recipients?
John T
eServices
So, is the list being actively moderated all of a sudden? Or is it
just malfunctioning again?
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SpamAssassin plugs
16 matches
Mail list logo
