Hi Scott,
Scott Fisher wrote:
Are there any end users who are using the VAMSOFT IMAGE SPAM AGENT tht
would like to comment on it's effectiveness / processor utilization?
it seems to not use much cpu; its effectiveness is ok. In case you are
unaware it does not ocr the email, it just works on pr
BlankAre there any end users who are using the VAMSOFT IMAGE SPAM AGENT tht
would like to comment on it's effectiveness / processor utilization?
- Original Message -
From: David Barker
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 12:08 PM
Subject: RE: [D
John,
I assigned a weight base on this scale:
10 Low Spam
15 Mid Spam
20 High Spam
I guess which is pretty much the same scale as HOLD at 20.
David Barker
Director of Product Management
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933 office
978.988.1311 fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Me
Hi David,
Great information, thank you.
What is the hold value for this setup, 20? The provided syntax is great, but
it would generally be helpful to know that the test should be valued at x%
of your hold weight. I hesitate to assume but wanted to make sure if it was,
in fact, based off of the de
Declude and Image based spam - 4 methods
1. COMMTOUCH
Commtouch Recurrent Pattern Detection contains an intrinsic mechanism to
exact-match recurrent patterns across similar but not-identical messages.
However in the case of images, the minute the spammer makes even the
smallest changes to an imag
Has there been a declude filter created for blocking or identifying
image spam? If so can somebody post it for me to try.
Thank You,
Kelly
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
