whitelisted to all recipients.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Imail Admin
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting
Hi David,
Yup, that was my first check. The address book in question
Hi All,
We're in the process of tesing JM 4.x as an upgrade and I ran into what I am
sure is a minor mis-configuration.
I find that I occassionally get messages that are clearly spam, but are
whitelisted. The common characteristic is that they are sent with a from line
that is my own email
4. VAMSOFT IMAGE SPAM AGENT
This tool is an External Agent for ORF 2.1 and newer versions that
improves
ORF by image spam detection capabilities, but can be used by Declude.
http://www.vamsoft.com/vsimagespam/vsimagespam.zip
VSIMAGE externalnonzero
I'm currently on 2.0.6.16 with Imail 8.22. My SA gives me the choice to
upgrade to 3.13 or 4.3.14. I'm not really clear on why there are now two
versions. Which one should I be considering? Any open problems big enough
to suggest holding off?
Thanks,
Bill
---
This E-mail came from
: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrading - which version?
Bill,
I would suggest 4.x the 3.x is for individual products whereas 4.x is all
3
products PRO version.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
AlamoHost Admin
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 4:59 PM
Is the subscription to AVG part of Declude now or does the user need
to purchase a subscription from AVG in order to get definition
updates?
The prices for the AVG mail server version isn't much better than F-Prot.
They only list prices up to 100 mailboxes - $1,030 for 2 years.
---
This
According to something I read on the Alligate Support forumn at least as
far back as March. Interesting that they have never issued much of a press
release on it to there customer base. Tho I licensed mine in Februrary of
this year so I'm good for a bit.
At 12:59 PM 7/14/2006 -0700, you
At 03:31 PM 7/12/2006 -0400, David Barker wrote:
As far as I know this still works, although majority of customers do not
send virus notifications.
What gives you this opinion might I inquire?
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail
One that I used to use was in Men Mice Tools and the entire thing is very
useful. Still use it at home a lot when I am doing certain things.
Jay
At 02:22 PM 6/1/2006 -0700, you wrote:
A little off topic but I remember seeing a post in the past on a great ping
program on the list but forgot
I'd sure like to see some Declude comments on this discussion.
Ben
BC Web
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience with 4.x
Darrell,
I put up two Windows Explorer
Based on the discussion under Declude JM, I'm also looking at adding
invURIBL. However, I find the weighting system in the invurible.exe.config
file very confusing. This is the total weight passed to Declude? I can't
figure out what typical weight scores would be or how to adjust them.
Just
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IMail Admin
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 10:46 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] problem with DNSstuff.com web site
I read the abuse link before, but it is unhelpful, and I couldn't get
Some folks route spam to an email address that the admin reviews, but that
is a violation of privacy and not a direction we care to go.
So add this and stop spending so much time worrying.
trailer.txt
---
WARNING: All e-mail sent to or from this address will be received or
otherwise recorded
questions or issues you may have. If you have a need to contact us in a
non-public way our whois record does have an E-mail address that can be
used.
http://www.dnsstuff.com/pages/forums.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IMail Admin
Sent
Thanks Scott, and good to hear from you again!
Is there anyway to back track this Java program that was browsing your site?
I keep a pretty tight lid on viruses and spyware, but it seems to me
something must be infected somewhere. Also, do you have any dates? It
would help if I knew something
Hi All,
I've been trying to access www.dnsstuff.com and www.dnsreport.com from my
desktop system. I keep getting this reply:
Sorry, you have triggered our rate limiting system. If you are reading this
in a web browser, we apologize -- we want you to use the site as much as you
like. What we do
.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imail Admin
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 6:08 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] problem with DNSstuff.com web site
Hi All,
I've been trying to access
OK, so now I've turned all recursion back on. As it is, I can't see any
postings to the group because the SPAM ratings are all too high and they're
being deleted. Let's hope things are back to normal.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: IMail Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED
it wouldn't be available to the
public. The public DNS servers I can then turn off their recursion feature.
What do you think?
Thanks again,
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail Admin Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 12:06
, and ye shall find!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IMail Admin
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 12:20 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM
scores?
Hi Sandy
but allow recursion.
John T
eServices For You
Seek, and ye shall find!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IMail Admin
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 9:45 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
Hi All,
I was testing out our domain name at dnsreport.com, and it complained that
we had recursion turn on at the DNS server. So I tried turning it off, and
suddenly all our JM scores went through the roof. I've got a sample from
some personal mail below. It looks to me like IPs weren't
Might be a sore spot for some, but others of us have done that a while
back. MS SMTP and all of that stuff was painful and the solution you are
going to seems to work flawlessly for us. Has cut the load that we have on
the Imail/Declude Server a bunch.
And I plan to expand the thing to a couple
Using other's mailing lists for support and public documentation, ldap, VBS
scripts. And free vs. free and both IMHO are equal amounts of spam.
Tarpitting, country blocking and native Win service and about five minutes
of my time. Sorry and it wasn't just address validation.
Unix sendmail is
First, I vote AGAINST anything with 4 in it. Why 4? You were calling it
version 4, but that's a complete misnomer. Currently, it represents the
same feature set as the so-called version 3, so there is no reason to call
it version 4. In addition, there are three components in it (AVA, JM, HJ),
Perhaps you/others might want to add this url to your toolbox.
http://ws.arin.net/whois/?queryinput=198.145.23.0
Palin Aquisitions Inc. PALIN-198-145 (NET-198-145-0-0-1)
198.145.0.0 - 198.145.255.255
MRC Marketing 198-145-23-0 (NET-198-145-23-0-1)
Title: Message
Hi Barry,
Maybe I've just been out of the loop, but that's
the first mention I've heard of Declude 4.0. We've been waiting on
upgrading to 3.0 pending some confidence in its reliability. Is 4.0
something schedule for this year, or far out in the future?
Thanks,
Ben
BC Web
At 04:59 PM 12/16/2005 -0500, Barry Simpson wrote:
Pong
Shhh
Which is a relief :-)it's cold.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
I just opened a window and sat there it finally downloaded took a while.
At 05:19 PM 11/28/2005 -0800, Kevin Bilbee wrote:
Same problem here. I get an Internal Server Error
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Richard
yes, but I've been waiting all year for SM 3.0, with no end in site.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 8:02 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0
Nice to know!
Now
At 02:47 PM 10/25/2005 -0500, you wrote:
Something changed at the time the new architecture came out. Either folks
started using a lot of new / broken clients, or Declude became more
sensitive.
In my opinion a lot of broken clients started happening. Whereas I beta
tested the new version on my
I am having a problem with an authenicated user that has an IP that is
major big-time on the spam lists. Is there anyway to strip off his
originating ip info and not pass it along?
Guess that T-Mobile has finally started at least cleaning up there address
space but this person needs to get his
it in MAILPOLICE, and if you have URIBL support, it is
also in SURBL presently.
Matt
IMail Admin wrote:
Hi,
For the last few weeks, we've seen an explotion of spam mail with the
from line as New Account. The subject and text vary. Some messages
get caught by our threshold and dumped
Hi,
For the last few weeks, we've seen an explotion of spam mail with the from
line as New Account. The subject and text vary. Some messages get caught
by our threshold and dumped, but many do not. Sniffer seems to spot these
pretty effectively, but not always and we don't take action on
If files are not moving from proc to work make sure you downloaded the
right version, I grabbed smartermail version this AM and it does exactly
nada under Imail. Duh. Got the Imail version and of course its running now.
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Prot]
---
This E-mail came from the
I think that the exploit is in imail 7.07 and not in your server do a
google on
imail 7.07 exploit.
So you most likely would need to upgrade to 8.2 series. Tho the exploit
isn't in 8.15 I don't believe. BTW they do seem to have some interesting
pricing going on if you google imail deals depending
I think you have this backwards: the hang-up here isn't Declude, it's
SmarterMail. I'm very interested in SmarterMail myself, but I'm not even
going to try a trial until they add the AUTH feature.
Ben
BC Web
- Original Message -
From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi Barry, and thanks for the explanation. The only thing that concerns me
is that we renewed our Declude service agreement this spring, but have never
been able to download an upgrade to Declude due to the bug(s). So I'm just
a little concerned about how long before we have a stable 2.x version
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=martek.net
Fix all of your problems.
Your Nameservers aren't working.
At 01:24 PM 8/3/2005 -0500, you wrote:
One of my domains is having trouble sending email to HotMail. I have a reverse record and spf record setup for the offending
Or you could just block the IP's in Imail from which the attacks are coming...or in your router.
At 05:18 PM 7/29/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Easy way to find out if it is dictionary attacks: count the number of times ERR * invalid user appears in a single day's log. I wouldn't be surprised to
Just a curiosity: I received an email from someone at Veritas, and the
subject line was:
Fw: [WARNING - POSSIBLY NOT VIRUS SCANNED]Re: VERITAS Support: Case ID
I'm assuming that this warning was added by their system? Why would they do
that? If they knew it wasn't scanned, why wouldn't they
We use Declude JM Pro with IMail, and have been thinking about SmarterMail.
We often use the ability to direct messages in certain weight ranges (e.g.,
10-20) to go to certain mailbox folders (spam). Are you saying this
feature isn't supported when using JM with SM?
Ben
- Original Message
So how about all the hot new features of IMail 8.2? How do those compare
with similar features in SmarterMail?
Also, we mostly use IMAP, rather than the web interface. How does the IMAP
feature in Smartermail compare to Imail?
For that matter, is there any change to the IMAP feature in Imail
, April 05, 2005 10:35 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
I think it uses STP...The Racer's Edge.
- Original Message -
From: Imail Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 6:18 PM
Subject: Re
Just curious: does SmarterMail use SMTP or something similar?
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 7:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
Yes.
If all users send through your
not know the difference.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ncl Admin
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 2:34 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2.x
At 04:40 PM 3
sages (70%) that failed some other
test.
Thanks,
Ben
BC Web
- Original Message -
From:
Imail
Admin
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 12:15
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
catchallmails question
Thanks, Darrell. This at lea
t one stuck into my
head.
Hope that helps.
Darrell
---Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue
Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message
At 04:40 PM 3/3/2005 -0500, Andy Schmidt wrote:
I generally agree that the new function is desirable. Now we just need to
figure out how to implement it robustly.
E.g., when Declude modifies the envelope to the new route-to address, it
may have to remember that new recipient so that it can
Title: Message
Hi,
I have a strange question, which once against my
astounding ignorance. I just tried using DLAnalyzer Lite on our latest
Declude JM log. For the sample I tested, I got these results:
Total Messages Processed: 11,234Messages That
Failed Defined Test(s): 10,153Percentage
At 02:54 PM 3/1/2005 +0100, Erik wrote:
After many emails to Declude about this, they confirmed to me this IS a
problem and one of not a high priority to fix. We've reverted back to 1.82
until it's fixed.
We have as well. I just tried 2.05 yesterday and spent 1 1/2 hours fixing
stuff this
At 11:20 AM 3/1/2005 -0500, Goran Jovanovic wrote:
I put in the 2.0.5 upgrade on the weekend and so far have no seen any
problems. I did the manual install and copied the declude.exe over, did
the -diags and then started the SMTP service.
I have looked in the logs but see nothing unusual. What
Hi All,
Hope you don't mind another simple question...
I have a spam message with a weight of 2:
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SNIFFER [2]
The problem with this line was that we have sniffer weighted at 7. So I
went to the Declude JM log and came up with this:
03/01/2005 13:17:46 Qdbca042102961063
]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] timeout test on Spam
That usually indicates your are having DNS issues. Are you sure your DNS
server is healthy and responding to queries quickly?
Darrell
Imail Admin writes:
Hi All
use a variant of Matt's badcountrynorevdns test to punish timeout's from
spam haven countries:
BadCountryREVDNSTimeout.txt:
REVDNS END NOTIS (Timeout)
COUNTRY 50 IS CN
COUNTRY 50 IS KR
COUNTRY 40 IS RU
- Original Message -
From: Imail Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
I've noticed in the last couple of weeks a huge upsurge in junk mail getting
through our system with lower weights (i.e., ending up in the InBox instead
of the spam folder or being deleted). We don't do a lot of tweaking with
our configuration files, so we normally expect a certain small
Hi,
We regularly use the whitelist feature with our clients, and it always
works. Now, however, when I try to use it with our own domain, it doesn't
seem to be operating.
When I connect to our mail server from home (using broadband cable) to send
messages, the system always gives me a high spam
Anyone seeing odd problems with hotmail and msn.com accounts being rejected.
I have a number of valid email's that are being rejected.
1:24 13:00 SMTPD(61d200c101cc4412) [66.162.138.13] connect 65.54.168.114
port 60403
01:24 13:00 SMTPD(61d200c101cc4412) [65.54.168.114] EHLO hotmail.com
01:24
Thanks, Scott. I also thought that whitelist files included all of the same
options as the whitelist commands that go into a global.cfg file. What
about @domain-name? Does that work in a whitelist file?
Thanks,
Ben
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I don't buy this agrument. I use Eudora and don't fail those tests. Did
this message fail those tests?
At 10:55 AM 1/13/2005 -0500, Dave Doherty wrote:
Hi Scott-
Len says it's common to all versions of Eudora. Is there a way to make an
adjustment where the mailer contains Eudora? Or is that
At 07:59 AM 1/2/2005 +1100, you wrote:
Great way to increase sales due to the need to update service agreements.
Anyone that runs production software without service agreements gets what
they deserve.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This
Message -
From: Ncl Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 10:51 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders Glitch?
At 07:59 AM 1/2/2005 +1100, you wrote:
Great way to increase sales due to the need to update service
Thanks, Scott.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF question
I have a question about setting up the SPF string.
If I use this string:
v=spf1 a mx
Thanks for your help, Scott.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 4:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] understanding JM scores
Thanks, Scott. Ok, one more: here is the scoring system I use:
Hi,
I have a question about setting up the SPF string.
If I use this string:
v=spf1 a mx a:bcw5, a:bcw6 -all
as a text record in our domain (bcwebhost.net), then the SPF test checks the
sending IP and tries to match it against either bcw5.bcwebhost.net or
bcw6.bcwebhost.net. The -all option
So what does the =IGNORE mean in the logs? Such as this:
CMDSPACE=IGNORE IPNOTINMX=IGNORE NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE SPFFAIL=IGNORE
LOCALCMDSPACE=IGNORE WEIGHT5=SUBJECT WEIGHT5r=MAILBOX CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE
And if this is only a list of tests that failed, then is there no list of
tests the passed?
Thanks, Scott. Ok, one more: here is the scoring system I use:
BADHEADERS badheaders x x 8 0
BASE64 base64 x x 4 0
CMDSPACE cmdspace x x 8 0
COMMENTS comments x x 7 0
HELOBOGUS helovalid x x 5 0
IPNOTINMX ipnotinmx x x 0 -3
MAILFROMenvfrom x x 12 0
NOLEGITCONTENT nolegitcontent x x 0
Hi,
I'm trying to better understand how JM scores weights. I sent a test
message from one of our internal accounts to another, and it came out with a
spam weight of 5. This was in the header:
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [66.224.41.4]
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail
Hi,
There is one point about the setup of SPF records in DNS that confuses me:
SPF compares the return address of email against the IP of the MX record for
that domain. However, the MX record doesn't point to an IP, it points to a
host name, which may be in another domain. So the MX record for
I've been just begging for motivation to upgrade from 7.15 to 8.x, and so
far, the only good reason I've found is the WHITELIST AUTH feature.
Otherwise, it's hard to see any reason for upgrading, especially when I've
got a stable, trouble-free mail server now, and an upgrade could introduce
any
- Original Message -
From: System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 4:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Conditional test weighting
on 6/24/04 6:07 PM, Imail Admin wrote:
Is it possible to make the weight of a test conditional?
Here
Hi Scott,
Thanks for the quick reply. What do you mean by apply to certain users?
If I add a line to a filter to the global.cfg file, it runs for everyone.
So where in the filter file do I apply per-domain settings? For example, in
the REMOTEIP code I was looking at, it seems the REMOTEIP test
Sorry Scott, I just realized I was being Monday-morning befuddled. The
inclusion of the filter line in the global.cfg file only defines the test,
just as all the other tests are defined there. It's only when I put the
reference in the $default$.junkmail file to that test name that the test is
I must really be slow today, so my apologies in advance... Applying actions
for different tests for different users/domains is fine. If I put
YOURTESTNAME DELETE into a per-domain junkmail file, then messages that
fail that test will be deleted. However, what about weighting? If I define
a
Thanks for your patience Scott. I think I understand now, although my
actual test doesn't seem to be working. Perhaps you can tell me where I'm
going wrong?
1. I put a reference to the filter in the global.cfg file (e.g.,
c:\imail\declude\cmdspacefilter.txt x 0 0). Notice that I gave the
Hi Scott,
That's just what I needed. I took the script from someone else's earlier
reply to my questions about CMDSPACE. I guess the email message reformatted
the text, so the way I read it was to put the filter name inside the filter
file instead of inside the global.cfg file. Now that I've
BUY CHEAP DRUGS,OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Is it possible to make the weight of a test conditional?
Here is my thinking: we've been having problems with our own users getting
zapped by the CMDSPACE test. We are running IMail 7.15, so we don't have
access to the whitelist auth option. We can whitelist our own domains, but
that would let
Normally, we expect that all the clients we host on our own mail server
would get very low spam weights. However, I just recieved a message from a
client with a weight of 7. I'm trying to understand why the high weight.
Here is the message header:
Received: from slaptop [65.75.194.49] by
We're still running Imail 7.15 -- I have yet to see any value in upgrading
to 8.x -- so is there an easy way to do the whitelisting of local accounts
for IMail 7.x?
Also, what would you think about lowering the weight for CMDSPACE from 8 to
4?
Ben
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott
I'd like to second this question. I remember seeing a couple of discussions
here where people couldn't agree on which McAfee product to use as the
command line scanner with Declude. And, of course, the online stores always
emphasize the Windows-based products. So exactly which product is it
We have JM Pro, and have a few per-user settings. Now we have a client with
a nobody alias setup to catch all emails that aren't specifically
addressed to one of their mailboxes. They want custom JM settings for this
nobody alias. Can we just setup a nobody.jumkmail file like we would for
any
Hmmm..., that doesn't quite do what they want. They have an mailbox
julie, and nobody is an alias that resolves to julie. They want different
JM settings for mail specifically addressed to julie versus mail addressed
to no legitimate mailbox (which would get handled through the nobody alias).
Thanks, Scott. Actually, we're back at IMail 7.15. I have yet to see any
real benefit in the 8.x series.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] per user settings
And where do you get these?
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Scott Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Countries List
Mailpure's foreign-TLD and badcountrynorevdns are also good examples of
country filters
...
:)
~Joe
- Original Message -
From: IMail Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Countries List
So how do we use this functionality? Per your instructions, I'm trying
to
study the newsgroup
So how do we use this functionality? Per your instructions, I'm trying to
study the newsgroup postings to see how to use the extra functionalities
included in the Interim releases, but those postings seem to leave me with
more questions than answers.
Thanks,
Ben
- Original Message -
My client says they are still have getting email spam filtered by JM when it
should be white listed. Here is what I have:
The have a file whitelist.txt which for now has these entries:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are two blank lines after the scott listing. This file is
I sent you the JM log file off-line as you request. However, once I looked
at it closer, I found these lines:
03/18/2004 14:26:00.973 Q21f8015800fcaa67 Domain name =
paulsoncommodities.com, User name = Steve.
03/18/2004 14:26:00 Q21f8015800fcaa67 Using [incoming] CFG file
Did I miss something here? I created a whitelist for a client (we use DJ
Pro) by adding this line to their domain-specific $default$.junkmail file:
WHITELISTFILE D:\IMail\Declude\PaulsonCommodities\whitelist.txt
(I put it in right before their list of weighted tests).
Inside the whilte list
Thanks Scott. You're saying the whiltelist file needs a blank line at the
end? I didn't have one, but I just added one now.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
We're fairly new at using JunkMail and we want to refine the process beyond
the basic tests (typically weight10 or weight20). What strategy or steps
would you recommend next?
Two obvious ideas are Filtering and the ip4r tests. For filtering, I'm
concerned about the system overhead and the
blah.
Thanks,
Ben
- Original Message -
From: IMail Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:41 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] refining the filtering process
We're fairly new at using JunkMail and we want to refine the process
beyond
the basic
Thanks for the answer on the subject question. Your answer on the other
(refining...) question was a bit shorter than I was hoping for. Do you have
an archive for your JunkMail list messages? I've been scanning through the
archives of IMail, but it's hard to pinpoint the right information.
Matt sorry I am new to declude is there someone that uses it that I can call
to help me get mine right.
John
- Original Message -
From: Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:02 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] sample global cfg
101 - 195 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
