Found the issue..
While I was waiting for a response I went back to the non beta of declude
version same as the other mail server and the helobogus error is gone. I
then reinstalled the beta version and the error is back.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is interesting. We are happy with the configuration of declude jm so we
use the EXACT same setting on our other mail server. I sent a test message
from our web server to both with the same exact information and below is
what I got.
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Dec 2003 14:54:01.0812 (UTC)
FILET
Here is one from lastnight.
Received: from maineconnect.net [216.204.154.7] by mail.sslsales.com with
ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.14) id A80954B50060; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 22:27:05 -0500
Received: from web1.sslsales.com [216.204.153.96] by maineconnect.net with
ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.01) id A9C262450100; Tue, 02 D
>Also it seems that declude is claiming that 216.204.154.7 has no MX.
>DnsStuff.com reports:
>>Actually, that's a server of yours, which you've let Declude JunkMail know
>>about.
How do I tell it not to know about it and my web servers as well? So they
dont fail the MX test.
This stops some mail
http://atriks.com/email_deployment.htm
Seen quite a few of them. Yet to figure the company out though.
Seems like a great place for spammers to hang out ...
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 01, 20
I've gotten serveral of these the past few minutes.
Below are the full headers ..I'm assuming they are trying to relay ???
There was no subject nor message as well as a rcpt to ...
Also it seems that declude is claiming that 216.204.154.7 has no MX.
DnsStuff.com reports:
How I am searching:
Askin
LISTSERV.USAIRWAYS.COM) [1 1 0 ]
07/15/2003 20:15:32 Q98f407e001d8e3ba NOABUSE:2 nIPNOTINMX:-2 . Total
weight = 0
David Barrett
Maine Connect, Inc.
" I'd rather be a failure at something I enjoy than be a success at
something I hate "
-- George Burns
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses b
a MUA/MTA 211.243.11.104
with
no reverse DNS entry.
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 13 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10.
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [211.243.11.104]
X-Declude-Spoolname: D18a2a9cf007cfa90.SMD
I have declude set up to hold at 10 delete at 20. Any thoughts ?
David
I have been trying to get the IP Black list file to
function properly. Below are the settings I am using..
GLOBAL.CFG
IPFILE fromfile d:\imail\declude\ipblacklist.txt x
20 0
DEFAULT.JUNKMAIL
IPFILE HOLD
I added my IP address to the IPFile and sent a test
message with no luck except my
0.1 SMTPD (1DCB00DC) [65.217.137.37] EHLO mx1
20021106 001305 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (1DCB00DC) [65.217.137.37]
unacceptable mail address in MAIL FROM:"Eddy
Thanks,
David Barrett
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This
Every once in a while I get mail that has no
declude info in the headers.
EG:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Thu, 16
May 2002 13:22:16 GMTSubject: All Natural Breast Enhancement
FormulaMessage-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>X-Info:
please report abuse of this service to [EMAIL PROTECTED]Content-Length
Seeing every one else is curious count me in !!
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "John Tolmachoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:26 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] CIDR listings for china, Korea, Taiwan
?
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Networ
Samarelli
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:25
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] mx server
settings and
I think the have a problem.
- Original Message -
From:
David
Barrett
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
-
From:
Frederick Samarelli
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:09
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] mx server
settings and
Every ip I tested with XBL shows listed. Even non
valid ips.
- Original Message -
From:
David
I was wondering, pondering or hoping this is correct...I have
an MX server that scans email for Viri and Spam via Sophos and DJM. Once "Ok"
from the scanning it forwards the mail to the actuall mail server.I have
allow relay on the mx server and send all mail through remote gateway ( the
I was setting up a networkpath path eg. \\123.123.123.123\imail for the log
files. But There was a type-o so I got a runtime error.
Now when I start the program the error persists. I just uninstalled and
reinstalled.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Schwarz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <
Scott,
In your manual it
reads.
This means that if E-mail isn't delivered directly to your IMail server
(for example, if the MX record for your domain points to a virus scanner, that
then forwards to your IMail server), you
can still use Declude JunkMail!
Does this mean that dec
Very nice. I just saved a ton of time going through the files.
FYI used it on XP Pro and 2000 server / remote and local. Very quick !
Great Job !!!
David Barrett
Maine Connect, Inc.
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Schwarz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECT
Note: Spam Checked for Secure Services Inc. by Declude JunkMail
(www.declude.com).
X-Note: This E-mail was sent from warpdrive.maineconnect.net.
([208.3.246.244]).
David Barrett
Maine Connect, Inc.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-
Finally we got our Collocation people to repair
problems with our servers but I have one question about RDNS
If I have 3 servers should they be configured by
the actual name of the server or by mail.domain.com ?
When checking to see if they did what was asked at
dnsreport.com I get the foll
Thanks Scott !
> From: "User Name"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
That was the ticket !!
> >Also when we get notices from Networksolutions it gets marked with
BadWhois
> >X-RBL-Warning: Inaccurate or missing WHOIS data
> >Is the whois tracking important enough to be concerned with?
>
> Now *that*
s from Networksolutions it
gets marked with BadWhois
X-RBL-Warning: Inaccurate or missing WHOIS
data
Is the whois tracking important enough to be
concerned with?
David Barrett
Maine Connect, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
netWD:\IMail\maineconnect_netE0,S<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>NRCPT
To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>R<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks
David Barrett
Maine Connect,
Inc.
23 matches
Mail list logo
