RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Any word on the 2.06 release?

2005-03-16 Thread Gary Brumm
It's starting to look like things are going downhill since Scott left.  I don't remember ever having to wait this long for a issue to be resolved.  I don't feel comfortable with v2.xx until these issues are addressed.  I hope they get things togetherthis was always a very responsive company

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Organization changes at Declude

2005-02-22 Thread Gary Brumm
Scott, You will definitely be missed not only on the Declude lists but also the IMail list. Thanks for all of your help. You have provided a terrific amount of support to both Declude and non-Declude customers over the years. Best of luck in the future with whatever you do. Cheers, Gar

[Declude.JunkMail] Supporting Users with port 25 blocked

2005-01-24 Thread Gary Brumm
SBC just blocked port 25 for their dynamically assigned DSL users. I can have those users switch to SBC's SMTP servers but I have been meaning to open up port 587 for my users that travel. I was wondering what software solutions you guys have been using if any that could be run on the IMail m

[Declude.JunkMail] Aliases/Forwards/Processing

2004-10-31 Thread Gary Brumm
I just moved about 30 domains from another customer's Imail server and noticed that a lot of their domains were just forwarding mail directly from aliases. Is Declude (JMPro & AV) able to process these before forwarding?  How about accounts that are forwarded from "real" accounts? Thanks, Gary

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] This one got through.....

2004-10-06 Thread Gary Brumm
Scott, This was an incoming message and you are absolutely correct. I rechecked their config file. I had them set up with a "per domain" configuration and I missed changing WARN to HOLD on this one. I now have a template for the new domain specific configurations so I don't make this mistake a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] This one got through.....

2004-10-05 Thread Gary Brumm
, CMDSPACE, REVDNS, ROUTING, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT20 To see why it got through. And lastly what many other posters are going to ask is What do your logs say Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Brumm > Sent: Tuesday

[Declude.JunkMail] This one got through.....

2004-10-05 Thread Gary Brumm
Any idea why this message (here's the header) was delivered to the user. I have WEIGHT10 & WEIGHT20 set to HOLD and it seems to be working great otherwise. Thanks, Gary X-Message-Info: WJJZnOB93zJJi/xUvVMjoSwJwigkBr9B From: Collin Kiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 5.jpg

[Declude.JunkMail] SPF & HABEAS

2004-10-05 Thread Gary Brumm
After reading this article on SPF I am wondering about the merits of SPF: http://securitypronews.com/news/securitynews/spn-45-2004090816PercentofSpammersAdoptSPFEmailAuthenticationScheme.html Is SPF going to be exploited to the point where is is of little value? Also is anyone using the WHITELIST H

[Declude.JunkMail] Per Domain Configuration

2004-10-04 Thread Gary Brumm
I sent this request to Declude support earlier today but haven't received a response yet so I thought I would try it here.I am evaluating JMPro and had a question about the per domain configuration. If I set the directory name up with the official domain name (mail.domain.com) will it apply