RE: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail doesn't show attachments

2006-08-29 Thread Greg Birdsall
We had this same problem with Imail I had to go clean out the /spool/web directory. There are usually a lot of orphaned files in that folder, clearing them up fixes this issue.  I wrote a quick scheduled task to erase anything in that folder that is more that 30 days old. I believe

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What happened to the logging since 2.x????, it's HUGE

2006-05-22 Thread Greg Birdsall
Title: Message Er, Ive been using Declude 2.0.5 for about six months with Imail 8.22. It works just fine. Am I an oddity with this? Is there something that says that it isnt supposed to work? We do about ~1.5 million messages a day with this setup. - greg From:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Storage Server (NAS)

2006-05-18 Thread Greg Birdsall
We actually moved from Quad Sun V440s to the Supermicros for a weblogic/oracle application that we are running for a client. The numbers range from 45-70% faster on actual throughput and 75+% on database operations. We also brought our install base down from 45 servers to 30 with the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] recurrance of delayed message processing

2005-12-27 Thread Greg Birdsall
What is the total address range you block? - greg From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of randy armbrecht Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 2:15 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] recurrance of delayed message processing

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] recurrance of delayed message processing

2005-12-27 Thread Greg Birdsall
Scratch that I replied to the wrong message. - greg From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Birdsall Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 4:16 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] recurrance of delayed message

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Negative weighting filters to reduce false positives

2005-04-14 Thread Greg Birdsall
This is pretty interesting, but one question What is your hold weight set to? It seems that you are assigning a huge negative value for the first test, and much smaller for the other two, nay insight as to how you came up with these values? We are running into some of the same problems