[Declude.JunkMail] Unsubscribe from Declude lists not working

2006-11-12 Thread Harry Palmer
When I send an unsubscribe e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I receive the following error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: host smtp1.declude.com[66.92.83.27] said: 550 Recipient not in route list. (in reply to RCPT TO command) --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Which way to upgrade - SmarterMail or IMail

2006-07-13 Thread Harry Palmer
in-between the Internet and the SmarterMail server.The gateways reject a lot of unwanted traffic, so the SmarterMail server neverreceives much of the malicious code and dictionary attacks that frequently occur. In our installation, both SmarterMail and Declude have been very stable. Har

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: port forwarding

2006-03-22 Thread Harry Palmer
If you are hosting the new webmail on the same IIS server as the old IMail machine, you may do the following to allow users to continue using port 8383: On web server 1.) Start ProgramsAdministrative ToolsInternet Services Manager 2.) Select webmailpropertiestabWeb Site Advanced 3.) tabMultiple

[Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

2005-10-27 Thread Harry Palmer
It appears that Decludeproc v3.0.5.12 for SmarterMail is displaying its version in the header as v3.0.5.11. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

2005-10-27 Thread Harry Palmer
The response is: Declude Version 3.0.5.12 - Goto your smartermail directory at the command prompt and type Decludeproc -v Which version are you displaying ? David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Palmer Sent: Thursday, October

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?

2005-10-27 Thread Harry Palmer
Oops - I just restarted the service. It now reports the correct version. Thanks! - Did you stop the service when replacing the executable ? David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Palmer Sent: Thursday, October

RE: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-29 Thread Harry Palmer
Hi David, What is the recommended setting for SmarterMail delivery delay with Declude? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ] Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 3:56 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: Re[4]:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Any word on the 2.06 release?

2005-03-16 Thread Harry Palmer
We have been running Declude 2.05 with SmarterMail for a month without any problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 1:24 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Any word on the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - File manager for nonstandard files

2005-01-24 Thread Harry Palmer
TryDeleteFXPfiles available here... http://www.tucows.com/preview/335686.html -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave DohertySent: Monday, January 24, 2005 4:23 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - File

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude SmarterMail - Postfix

2005-01-07 Thread Harry Palmer
Len Conrad's IMGate at http://imgate.meiway.com works equally well with with SmarterMail and IMail. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael Jaworski Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 10:54 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude SmarterMail

2005-01-06 Thread Harry Palmer
is the interface between Smarter Mail and IMGate? =Di you write a custom XML export routine? - Original Message - From: Harry Palmer To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 11:51 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude SmarterMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude SmarterMail

2005-01-05 Thread Harry Palmer
We are testing SmarterMail and Declude now. It is workingquite well with a few outstandingissues. It's still in beta.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude SmarterMail

2005-01-05 Thread Harry Palmer
ain server and targeting the higher preference number MX on the cache. -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc. - Original Message - From: Harry Palmer To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 7:24 PM Subject: RE: [Declud

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders Glitch?

2005-01-03 Thread Harry Palmer
Why not just set the SPAMHEADERS weight to zero in GLOBAL.CFG as a workaround until the problem is fixed by a new release? --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail

2004-12-29 Thread Harry Palmer
Title: Declude and Smartermail Does anyone actually have a production Smarter Mail/Declude server in use? We have a production SmarterMail serverhosting 27 siteswith 1800+ users. SmarterMail replaced IMail here on December 14, 2004. SmarterMail performance has been very good. We tested

IPWHOIS:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Advice for SUBJECT text

2002-05-20 Thread Harry Palmer
On domains where the subject is modified, we add UCE~ to indicate Spam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J Porter Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 11:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Advice for SUBJECT text I had the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Duplicate warnings and weights.

2002-02-13 Thread Harry Palmer
Perhaps it would be helpful to add the word In or Out to the error text? X-RBL-Warning: Open relay. Please see http://orbz.org/?165.252.48.3 X-RBL-Warning: Open relay. Please see http://orbz.org/?165.252.48.3 X-RBL-Warning: Blocked - see http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?165.252.48.3 X-RBL-Warning:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Duplicate warnings and weights.

2002-02-13 Thread Harry Palmer
I just sent them an e-mail with that suggestion. X-RBL-Warning: Open relay. Please see http://orbz.org/?165.252.48.3 X-RBL-Warning: Open relay. Please see http://orbz.org/?165.252.48.3 Perhaps it would be helpful to add the word In or Out to the error text? Yes, it would. You may want to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v1.37 released

2002-02-06 Thread Harry Palmer
Sniffer with works with 1.37 beta here. Thanks! - Declude v1.37 released We have just released Declude v1.37 (as a beta, although it only includes fixes). For Declude JunkMail, it takes care of two issues with the fromfile test type, gets variables to work properly in the subject, and

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] header confusion

2002-01-31 Thread Harry Palmer
Perhaps MSG_BODY_BEGIN MSG_BODY_END or MSG_BODY_TOP MSG_BODY_BOTTOM - By the way, can anyone think of a better names than HEADER/FOOTER when dealing with text added to the body of the E-mail? That *is* very confusing (especially when trying to explain it The HEADER action adds a

[Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer

2002-01-31 Thread Harry Palmer
Is it possible to assign a weight to sniffer? If so, what is the proper syntax? --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer

2002-01-31 Thread Harry Palmer
FTC Plans Crackdown on Junk E-mail http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,44477,00.html --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer

2002-01-31 Thread Harry Palmer
Thanks, Scott. I have just installed sniffer this afternoon. It's working very well. Is it possible to assign a weight to sniffer? Yes. If so, what is the proper syntax? SNIFFER external nonzero C:\IMail\Declude\Sniffer\sniffer.exe 10 0 That would define a weight of 10